“I
returned and saw under the sun that the race is not to the swift, nor
the battle to the strong, nor yet bread to the wise, nor yet riches to
men of understanding, nor yet favor to men of skill; but time and chance happens to them all” (Ecclesiastes 9:11 MKJV).
I received revelation on the word “chance” in this version.
Another version is
pretty much on the money:
“I returned and saw under the sun that the race is not to the
swift, nor the battle to the mighty; nor even bread to the wise; nor
even riches
to the men of discernment; nor even favor to knowing men. For time
and occurrence happen to them all” (Ecclesiastes 9:11 LITV).
What
that verse is saying is that nothing happens
by our power; God does it all, “chance” meaning “fate” or “all
things are determined from above.” Aesop’s fable of
the tortoise and hare race are an example, but not a good one.
That
story illustrates
that the race can be won by the slow on occasion, that speed
is not the only determining factor. What Ecclesiastes says is that
whatever
happens is
out of our hands, though we go through the motions.
Fatalism? No;
that is an attitude, though definitions don’t
always describe it that way. I speak of wisdom, knowledge, and
understanding
of the way things are. But to the definition one source gives
the word, I say, “Yes.”
WordWeb:
“1. A submissive mental attitude resulting from acceptance of
the doctrine that everything that happens is predetermined and
inevitable
2.
A philosophical doctrine holding that all events are predetermined
in advance for all time and human beings are powerless
to change them”
I'm talking with a Catholic young man in his early twenties and you
have helped me withn your testimony. Fortunately I was a stranger to
Roman heresy. I already knew a verse to tell him, but the rest of your
testimony helped me see where the young man in front of me is at.
I love you brother, take care.
-John
Victor's response:
Hi John,
I am thankful I can be a signpost leading in the right direction as
people learn where I came from and how good the change has been for me.
As for your unfamiliarity with Roman heresy, that would be a rare spectacle.
Perhaps you aren't aware of its unidentified prevalence.
For examples, do you celebrate "Christ's Mass" (Christmas)?
Do you celebrate "Ishtar/Ashtoreth" (Easter), substituted
for Passover?
Do you believe in the trinity, which was brought forth by pagans into
the nominal Christian identity?
Do you believe in eternal torment?
Do you believe in infant baptism, sacraments, praying the "Our
Father," spiritual promotion through catechism and confirmation,
and several other such doctrines and practices?
Do you believe in buildings called "churches," particularly
with steeples and arched entrances, which are considered holy places?
Do you believe in pictures of Jesus?
Do you believe in any kind of clerical privilege versus that of laity?
If your answer is "yes" to any of these questions, you are
not a stranger to Roman heresy, much of which preceded the Roman
Catholic
Church, only a stranger to your familiarity with it (see our
Statement of Doctrine for more
information on all of these subjects, and much more).
I am thankful to be able to share these things with you now. I
am so very thankful to be free, not only from the primary bondage of
sin and the works of darkness men have devised and fashioned, but also
from
the subtle vestiges of these.
Victor
Daphne asks Victor:
Why is praying the “Our Father” wrong? Does it have to do
with the repetition of prayer?
Victor’s reply:
Hi Daphne!
Yes, it does have to do with repetition of prayer, but not only repetition
(which is the worse). Jesus never meant for those words to even have
been recited once as personal prayer. When He said, "Pray like
this," or, "Pray after this manner," or, "Pray
in this way," He
was giving an example of the attitude and understanding of, and in,
true prayer. In the sample words of the "Our Father" or the "Lord's
Prayer," He addresses our hearts and expresses how we should be at
all times, not
only when
we
make
specific
prayers. It is this attitude to which Paul referred when he
said, "Pray
without ceasing" (1 Thessalonians 5:17 MKJV).
While there is no
harm in repeating those words in and of themselves, the great error
lies in thinking that God is so removed and base that He would
listen to a mere creature repeating him or herself over and over in
their own
righteousness. What is He supposed to get out of that, except an
upset stomach and sore eyes from rolling them? The very thought is contemptible.
Even saying those same words once and assuming He is going to hear
or be pleased, simply because they are the "Lord's prayer" (which
is a sycophantic attitude) or because they are in the Bible (which
is Bibliolatry) is unacceptable to God.
An exception might be if
a child (whether a physical or a spiritual one), not knowing any
better, sincerely speaks that sample prayer,
believing (the Lord knows and judges by the heart), but even there,
He cannot approve the ways of the heathen and is limited by
unbelief in general.
The Lord's message is, "Be reasonable, be respectful, understand
what He is like and what He desires; understand your duty before
Him, and know that He is running the show. Have knowledge of,
and faith
in, your Father (for He IS your Father), recognizing all your sustenance
comes from Him. As you treat others, so will you be treated. And
remember that you and this world are not where it's at. It is all
about God
and the Kingdom of God over all. Focus there, always."
"It is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God's sight,
but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous." Rom.
2:13
I think you need to find out which law he is speaking of in regard
to the fact that a law has been added after Jesus' crucifixion.
Paul's reply:
We agree with Romans 2:13, so it is not clear where you disagree
with us, or what point you are trying to make.
Do you believe the following, spoken by the Lord Jesus Christ?
"Do not think that I have come to destroy the Law or the Prophets.
I have not come to destroy but to fulfill. For truly I say to you, Till
the heaven and the earth pass away, not one jot or one tittle shall in
any way pass from the Law until all is fulfilled. Therefore whoever shall
relax one of these commandments, the least, and shall teach men so, he
shall be called the least in the Kingdom of Heaven. But whoever shall
do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the Kingdom of Heaven" (Matthew
5:17-19 MKJV).
There is no new Law, only a
new heart and understanding given to those who receive Christ.
Paul Cohen
Victor then asked this question of Paul and Sara:
Did you know that the Law of Moses (the 10 Commandments) is the Law
of Love?
Sara's reply:
Amen.
Matthew 22:35-40 MKJV
(35) Then one of them, a lawyer, asked, tempting Him and saying,
(36) Master, which is the great commandment in the Law?
(37) Jesus said to him, You shall love the Lord your God with all your
heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind.
(38) This is the first and great commandment.
(39) And the second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself.
(40) On these two commandments hang all the Law and the Prophets.
Victor's reply:
This fellow says there was a law added, which, as you point out, is
patently false. As nothing shall be subtracted from the Law, neither
shall there be anything added to it because it is complete, representative
of God's nature and
character. God missed nothing in the
Ten Commandments. The difference is not in the Law, as you say, but in
its fulfillment, which comes through
Jesus Christ, Who gives us a new heart with the Law in it and the love
for it. Any who think there is a new law added are still in their sin
nature.
One of life's great pleasures for lovers of truth is being able to heartfully
agree with your enemies. Though we do not personally count him an enemy,
Richard Dawkins, author of several books championing evolution, is a
great enemy of the truth and the Creator in this matter. We find his
attitude and teachings grossly untrue, irresponsible, and even reprehensible,
intellectually, scientifically, socially, and spiritually.
But when we
hear that Dawkins, along with Christopher Hitchens, is initiating legal
proceedings to have the pope arrested on his upcoming trip to England
on charges of obstruction of justice, we could not agree more, and
we applaud his efforts. Their reasoning is certainly legitimate. Why
should the
pope and his minions be above the law? Ought they not be held to at
least the same standards of justice as the common pedophile, if not more
severe
for their pretensions of morality?
Get this: The Catholic Church preaches
eternal damnation and torture for sinners, but pleads for the statute
of limitations regarding their
heinous sins! As they say in Yiddish, that is some chutzpah. You
go, Richard!