The Issues of Life began, in 2003, with a reader’s response
to our third Harvest Haven Herald. Victor, talking about the
sad state of affairs in the world and Canada, mentioned the legalization
of “gay
marriages,” among other things. A complaint soon followed
- “How bigoted you are to speak against ‘gay marriage’!” When
sending his reply, it struck Victor as a God-given opportunity to share
his answer with others, bringing to light the darkness of commonly held
convictions and errors before many.
We recently passed along a notice from one of our customers, giving
people the opportunity to register their disapproval of the Canadian
government’s award of the Order of Canada to a doctor for his work
as an abortionist. This time, several complained. Once again, the complaints
have served as a backdrop for the wisdom and counsel of God to be heard
by many, for which all saints are extremely grateful.
The world praises the one who brings out the best in others, which may
be fine, but the greater need of mankind is that we bring out the worst.
Yes, you red that right.
Those who speak the Truth of God will bring out the worst. An acquaintance
of ours began to believe what we were preaching, which was quite contrary
to her beliefs and practices and those of her family and religious friends
theretofore. When her family became aware of her wanting to join herself
to us, they examined our site and doctrine and were offended; some were
alarmed and came out with threats and curses. Our friend was shocked
and saddened, as she put it, that her sons and daughters and their spouses
would react in such ungodly fashion. After all, she thought to have taught
them differently; they all profess faith in Jesus Christ. Most of them
are members of what are known as Christian churches and Bible-preaching
religious organizations, such as the United Pentecostals and the Foursquare
Gospel. Her youngest is a pastor and fervent in works in the Name of
God. The talks and works are there.
She had always been trying to bring out the best in them, to teach her
children how to believe, speak, and act as Christians, according to her
understanding. Little did she know that what they needed was the Truth
instead of doctrine, substance instead of form, reality instead of religion,
and rebuke instead of praise. Little did she know they needed exposure
instead of display. It was not enough to dress dogs in wool and make
them look like sheep. They needed to be exposed for the dogs they are
and told the truth (that they are dogs and that only the miracle-working,
resurrection power of Jesus Christ could make of them sheep, new creatures
in Christ). Only His righteousness counts, and reasonable facsimiles
will not do.
The truth preached in our letters and on our site told them they were
wrong, in darkness, in error, not within the Kingdom of God, and not
pleasing to God as they suppose (in short, they are dogs), bringing out
the worst in them. To the religious who are consumed by their own righteousness,
their exposure is shocking, but it necessarily manifests the reality
of their state. When the worst comes out, they can decide to continue
therein and grow worse yet, or they can decide to repent and come to
the Lord to be changed, that they might worship Him in spirit and truth
with a new heart, which He alone can give them.
Did not Jesus Christ and His disciples bring out the worst in man? Did
not Jesus warn His disciples that they would be hated by all men as He
was? Did the people not kill them? Yet in the process of their exposure,
salvation came to the killers. Indeed, some experienced a complete reversal
of attitude and action. As the apostle Paul, formerly known as Saul of
Tarsus, wrote to new converts:
“But only they were hearing that he who then persecuted us, now
preaches the faith which he once ravaged. And they glorified God in me” (Galatians
1:23-24 MKJV).
First must the worst be exposed and identified. Only then can the true
solution come. As whitewash covers but does not change, so religion conceals
the corrupt nature while the corruption remains. Only an entire replacement
of an old nature by a new will do. We need men to speak the truth, so
that the worst may come out in those who hear the truth.
A Heinous yet Generally Accepted Social, Economic, and Environmental
Crime
As I write, I hear the roar of crop dusters in our area. It amazes me
how anybody can even conceive the notion that people have the right to
spray their properties from a plane with toxic chemicals, knowing full
well that some of them will carry into their neighbors’ properties.
It is an unconscionable act, and I am perplexed that there are not great
cries of outrage and protest - petitions, marches and all. Indeed, one
wonders how this madness could ever have been permitted. The likely reasons
for the lack of opposition to this crime are ignorance and having so
many other apparently bigger fish to fry. How many people living in cities
actually get to see or experience firsthand the effects of this poisonous
practice? It is out of sight, out of mind. Many do not know or care about
what they are eating and supporting.
And, to be sure, we have many forms of madness, several even worse,
like abortion and vaccinations, but, truly, crop dusting (or crop spraying)
is another abomination to all life.
Many are the stories I have heard of people having damage to their gardens,
trees, and general greenery because of aerial spraying near them. And
how many are those affected in their health? Many of these stories have
come without solicitation or direct discussion of the specific subject.
What is accepted as a necessity or productive agricultural practice
ought to be condemned as a crime, and its perpetrators fined and jailed.
How dare they impose their poisons on those who not only do not want
or need them, but who are harmed by them! Furthermore, nobody needs them.
Crop spraying or dusting occurs often near our community. At one particular
time, a potato crop was being sprayed for insects, and the prevailing
winds brought the visible mist of chemical upon us. Our eyes teared,
our noses and throats reacted, and we were helpless to do anything about
it. What are we supposed to do, keep greenhouses for our gardens and
have gas masks and protective clothing at the ready? What shall we do
for our children? Must we run for our houses, shut off air conditioners
and fans and remain locked up just because the perpetrator seeks to benefit
himself financially, the neighbors be damned? What is this?
At the time this particular spraying occurred, I tried to call whatever
authorities I could think of that were available. I got nowhere. A representative
for a government institution (I don’t remember which) came out
and rather tactfully (he seemed to be coached for such cases) defended
the practice of aerial spraying of pesticides as though I was protesting
people wearing clothing in public. “What’s the big deal?” was
the essence of his attitude, though well masked. To him, I was a fretting
crackpot.
We have people protesting the use of animal fur. We have the SPCA, Greenpeace,
and other organizations taking up the cause of the environment, animal
abuse, and other various issues. How few there are who recognize the
vile, wholesale slaughter of people, animals, greenery, insects and important
microcosms necessary for health and well being by aerial and ground crop
spraying with synthetic pesticides! I say that those responsible for
that kind of crop spraying are guilty of unpremeditated murder. Even
ground, never mind aerial, crop spraying should be counted an indictable
offense. It should be unheard of. Nobody should have to put up with it
any more than they should have to put up with arsonists, vandals and
stalkers.
No wonder we have the high incidence of mental, physical and emotional
diseases. In many and diverse ways, we are destroying ourselves, and
few care to pay any mind. People today are the unquestioning populace
of Logan’s Run, deceived and conditioned to believe the biggest
lies and perishing in the process.