Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Debunking Fallen Angel Myths

From: Brown Family
To: The Path of Truth
Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2016 10:29 PM
Subject: False teaching??

In short, the subject of fallen angels and what they did to the women of men has been debatable for sometime. Because the Bible doesn’t clarify in detail about this subject, there are references in the Bible that strongly suggest there was giants during that time in history. Let’s not forget that the supernatural is a real force from God as well as Satan and his demons. Yes, all we need to focus on is the Cross!! But to reference Bible scriptures for further study is not forbidden. There is reliable resources that would suggest that there was a time period in history that is not recorded in detail about the giants existence. 

Fossil and skeletal remains have prove the existence as well! Of course BIG Brother has covered up most the findings which defies the truth and maintains mainstream theology about Darwinism. Darwinism is Satan’s BIG LIE to the world. Proving the existence of Giants would be supported by the Word of God and flip Darwinism upside down! I don’t know why some Christians have a hard time understanding that Angels rebelled against God by leaving their place of residence, finding women of men attractive, having sexual relations, thus being punished by God!!! Yes we live in the 21st century and are far removed from our ancestors such that we have a hard time imagining that something like this could ever happen. Many Christians think that our current time in history is deplorable and Sadistic. This is true, but for what is coming doesn’t compare as Jesus said, “Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man.” (Luke 17:26) The world during Noah’s time suggest that there was a race of Giants along with other unnatural living creatures. Thus man became corrupt because of this evil presence on the earth. The Flood ensued.

Please explain why this study on scriptures (32 in fact) that talk about Giants be excused?

From: Paul Cohen
To: Brown Family
Cc: Victor Hafichuk
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: False teaching??

“Brown Family,” you’re confusing the “giants” of Genesis 6 with the giants in the land of Canaan, such as: 

“For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold, his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? Nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man” (Deuteronomy 3:11 KJV).

The root word used for giants in this verse is different from the word used for the offspring produced by the sons of God who went into the daughters of men in Genesis 6:4. Read about the latter here: Giants Who Bring Humanity Down

Angels of God and devils don’t physically mate with human beings – you won’t find that in the Bible. (You reference a study on giants in the Scriptures, but none is linked or attached.)

As for the cross, read: The Cross – Only the Death Sentence Will Avail


From: Brown Family
To: Paul Cohen
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2016 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: False teaching??


 I have question, is there any mention in the Bible about angels not being able to mate. I’m not talking about “not marrying”. These are two different things. Angels can obviously rebel against God and there is no mention about Angels not being capable of mating. Jesus clearly stated that the angels “in heaven” do not do this, but He did not say whether they were capable of doing such a deed. Also, He specifically pointed out that the ones “in heaven” don’t do this. But what about the angels who left their proper abode and are currently being held in chains of darkness because of the sinful activity they engaged in during Noah’s day (1 Peter 3:19-20; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6)? 

Another note, fossil records at the time of the Flood period shows that life forms were at enormous size. Dr. Carl Baugh - I believe God works through men to expose darkness. Dr. Carl Baugh is one of those men. We are not robots with narrow minds. Having said all of this, the supernatural is at work constantly -good & evil! There is nothing I can think of that is Heresy regarding the Giants before & after the flood existing through rebellious angels mating with women. Scripture does imply this which continues to be debatable. The result of all of this supports creation and not evolution. The question is “doesn’t the Holy Spirit reveal truths to us as believers even if it is not written word for word?”


Brown Family

From: Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk
To: Brown Family
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2016 7:56 AM
Subject: Re[3]: False teaching??

Who is the “Brown Family”? To whom are we speaking? 

But what about the angels who left their proper abode and are currently being held in chains of darkness because of the sinful activity they engaged in during Noah’s day (1 Peter 3:19-20; 2 Peter 2:4; Jude 6)?

The word used there is “spirits,” referring to human beings, as in: 

“To the general assembly and church of the first-born who are written in Heaven, and to God the judge of all, and to the spirits of just men made perfect” (Hebrews 12:23 MKJV).

The spirits Jesus preached to were the people in need of repentance and restoration who perished during the flood – “….who formerly disobeyed, when the longsuffering of God was waiting in the days of Noah, when the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight souls, were saved through water” (1 Peter 3:20 EMTV).

The word “angel” can also refer to human messengers, as in this translation of the underlying Greek word used in Jude 6 and 2 Peter 2:4:

“For this is the one of whom it is written, ‘Behold, I send My messenger [Greek, angelos] before Your face, who shall prepare Your way before You’” (Matthew 11:10 MKJV).

And because there were giants doesn’t prove they were the result of “rebellious angels mating with women.” In fact, it doesn’t even suggest such a thing, which, if examined logically, is frankly a preposterous notion. But we don’t need to examine or belabor the matter any further. The Scriptures we have given you are sufficient to dispel your theory. The real issue for you here is that you need to get real, beginning with Repentance and the Obedience of  Faith. You’ve never turned to the Lord Jesus Christ or known Him. 

This also answers your question:

The question is ‘doesn’t the Holy Spirit reveal truths to us as believers even if it is not written word for word?’

What we have just told you is the Word of the Lord, Jesus Christ coming in the flesh by His Spirit. We’re not simply reciting Scriptures for you, but the Lord Himself has revealed your heart of independence from God. What truth could be more important for you to hear? The things you’re engaging in are totally inconsequential, even diverting you from the truth you need to hear and face. 

Paul and Victor

From: Brown Family
To: Paul and Victor
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: False teaching??

Where do you source (what translation) the word used “spirits” referring to human beings instead of angels? Also, you stated “examined logically”. You hit the nail on the head. Nothing is revealed logically when it comes to God’s word. It is the Holy Spirit that gives us understanding. You don’t “logically” understand the Bible. That’s how some churches rationalize homosexuality through logic!! Yes!!!!! Our focus is on the Cross!! I have said that in past correspondence!! Paul, you can spend time looking into other verses and it’s meanings besides the one’s you mentioned below. I admire your focus! But that doesn’t mean you cannot study the whole word of God! And I think we can agree that their are those who would rather not talk or teach about some things in the “Word of God” fearing refute in the church! Which is an age-old problem!!!

C. Brown

[About half an hour later, “C” wrote:]


Just researched the version you are using MKJV. For your sake you need to dump this version ASAP!! It omits the the words “Holy Spirit”  88 times! from the previous versions along with a long list of changes. BEAWARE!!! Subtle changes from the truth corrupts God’s Word!! God has already warned us of that! Revelation 22:18-19 , Deuteronomy 4:2 ,Proverbs 30:5-6 [links defunct]

From: Victor Hafichuk
To: Brown Family
Cc: Paul Cohen
Sent: Sunday, September 25, 2016 4:40 PM
Subject: RE: False teaching??

“C,” from your letter just prior to this one: “Where do you source (what translation) the word used “spirits” referring to human beings instead of angels?

Here’s the original Greek word from the Textus Receptus manuscripts, as defined by James Strong in the KJV concordance. There is no incongruity on the part of the MKJV for Hebrews 12:23. 





From G4154; a current of air, that is, breath (blast) or a breeze; by analogy or figuratively a spirit, that is, (human) the rational soul, (by implication) vital principle, mental disposition, etc., or (superhuman) an angel, daemon, or (divine) God, Christ’s spirit, the Holy spirit: – ghost, life, spirit (-ual, -ually), mind. Compare G5590.





From G5594; breath, that is, (by implication) spirit, abstractly or concretely (the animal sentient principle only; thus distinguished on the one hand from G4151, which is the rational and immortal soul; and on the other from G2222, which is mere vitality, even of plants: these terms thus exactly correspond respectively to the Hebrew [H5315], [H7307] and [H2416]: – heart (+ -ily), life, mind, soul, + us, + you.

We are well aware of error in the MKJV as with the KJV and nearly every other translation we’ve used. Where any translation is unacceptable in a certain passage, we endeavor to avoid using it. 

Just as we have demonstrated the MKJV to be an accurate translation of the original in this instant, now show us where we have gone wrong with using the MKJV; finding error, we will correct. Let’s talk specifics and not generalities, and perhaps more importantly, reality and not religiosity, the latter of which seems to be rather abundant with you.


[About fifteen minutes later, Victor wrote:]

We’re speaking the logic and reason of the Lord Jesus Christ and not of man, “C.”

“Now therefore stand still, that I may reason [H8199] with you before the LORD of all the righteous acts of the LORD, which he did to you and to your fathers” (1 Samuel 12:7 KJV).





A primitive root; to judge, that is, pronounce sentence (for or against); by implication to vindicate or punish; by extension to govern; passively to litigate (literally or figuratively): –  + avenge, X that condemn, contend, defend, execute (judgment), (be a) judge (-ment), X needs, plead, reason, rule.

Come now, and let us reason [H3198] together, says Jehovah; though your sins are as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall be like wool. (Isaiah 1:18 MKJV)





A primitive root; to be right (that is, correct); reciprocally to argue; causatively to decide, justify or convict: – appoint, argue, chasten, convince, correct (-ion), daysman, dispute, judge, maintain, plead, reason (together), rebuke, reprove (-r), surely, in any wise.

Aren’t you being rather unreasonable, now?


Related posts:

The Son Is God, Not Merely a Role
From: Jason To: The Path of Truth Sent: Monday, May 09, 2016 2:30 PM Subject: Trinity RE:  You article on the Trinity: I enjoyed reading your article, and have long had issues reconciling the "trinity" myself.  Thus, this is why I find your perspective very interesting.  The one verse that I was hoping to see an explanation for was John 3:16 which is obviously one of the most quoted verses in the Bible. "16 “For God so loved the world,[a] that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life."  I read this as a gift ("gave") of something that God possessed ("his") [other than himself]. I'm curious as to how you reconcile this into your example that the "Son" is just a role and not another persona or manifestation of the one true God.  This could have easily been written by the sovereign God to say, "For God so loved the world, that he gave himself as a Son..."  But, it does not, it says that "he" (God) gave his only Son (a "person" or "persona" that was not himself)... Can you share your thoughts on this verse? Thanks in advance!!! Jason From: Paul Cohen To: Jason Cc: Victor Hafichuk Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:47 AM Subject: Re: Trinity “And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifested in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among nations, believed on in the w...
Questions on the Trinity Answered
From: Jock To: The Path of Truth Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:31 PM Subject: Trinity? So I started reading about Todd White, which lead me to another false teacher you mentioned, then to the Trinity. I noticed you take a hard line against it. Implying that it's a false teaching and saying that the scriptures used to validate it aren't found until later on, which I'm sure you're talking about 1 John 5:7 where the Bible says, "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one" which came about after the "Council of Nicaea" in 325AD so I wanted to ask a few questions regarding some scriptures. Matthew 3:17 "And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased" Matthew 17:5 " While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him. Like verses in Mark, Luke etc. Additionally, Acts 7:55-56; Romans 8:34; Ephesians 1:20; Colossians 3:1; Hebrews 1:3, 8:8, 10:12,12:2; 1 Peter 3:22, Revelations 3: 21; Matthew 22:44; Acts 2:33 Which all talk about Jesus sitting at the right hand of God. How's that possible unless they're different entities within One, such as the Trinity suggest? Furthermore, in 1 John 2:1 "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the ri...
Where Do Sinners Go When They Die?
From: Tyrone To: The Path of Truth Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2016 10:50 PM Subject: Hell Since you guys don't believe hell is eternal torment, then where do you think sinners will go, and what will happen to them? Like all the hall of false prophets you have on your website, where in the bible it states they receive much greater condemnation. What do you guys think happens them?  From: Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk To: Tyrone Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 7:11 AM Subject: Re: Hell Sinners are in hell, Tyrone. Hell is a spiritual place of darkness, where people are cut off from the Lord – the Light of All Men. But the state of hell isn’t an end unto itself, as taught by counterfeit Christianity and believed by you.  Read The State and Fate of Hell and The Great Promise of the Lake of Fire and the Second Death. The Lord said to the false teachers of His day: “Serpents! Offspring of vipers! How can you escape the condemnation of hell?” (Matthew 23:33 MKJV) The scribes and Pharisees were in hell - otherwise, they could have escaped its condemnation – do you see?   So what happens to those who receive greater condemnation? They’ll have to face the greater consequences of their culpability, just as a criminal with a more severe offense serves a greater sentence.   Here’s an example the Lord gave: “Woe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! For if the powerful acts which were done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repen...

Leave a Reply

You have to agree to the comment policy.