Definition of False Teacher: One who presumes to teach in the Name of the Lord when God has not sent him.

Print Friendly

False Teacher – Jim Watt and George Müller

A Cloud Without Water

It does not cease to amaze us how the prophets and teachers of darkness are all equally without substance, no matter how much they know, how experienced, how religious, or how old they may be. They are all the same – empty clouds promising rain and providing not a drop � and the older they get, the drier. They are altogether presumptuous, self-willed, proud, incorrigible, implacable, arrogant, and worse than worthless in all their ways.

We sent a paper to Jim Watt on the reconciliation of all things – Satan’s Redemption – a rebuttal to Derek Prince’s refutation of Universalism. We brought forth much Scripture and sound reason to substantiate the truth that God will reconcile all things to Himself.

(We now promptly declare we presently do battle with Satan, the arch foe of all the elect of God, in that we address Mr. Watt and his error. This is to give you opportunity to escape bias and consider this subject, instead of immediately tuning out and hiding, by predisposition, in ignorance and consequent fear.)

Mr. Watt responded to our document, albeit not to us first – he publicly condemned us as false teachers and warned his readers to avoid us. He gave no refutation for the things we had to say. He provided no justification for his rejection, except to say that famous others have refuted what we teach, which is not possible, seeing they have not witnessed exactly what we teach, which is different from what many Universalists teach.

Even if others have tried to refute what we teach, are they right? Does Mr. Watt not have anything of his own to say? Does he not have his own oil? It appears not. As is so often the case with those who don’t have their own oil, he simply sat in his homemade pontifical throne, wearing a presumed mantle he claims he received from the late George Hawtin in a dream (we are to take his word for it) (the reputed principle elder in the 1948 “Visitation”), and summarily dismissed us from his throne room.

The problem is that we don’t go so easily, for these people must give an account for their arrogance and iniquity. We have posted all that we wrote to Mr. Watt (you have the link above), and we do now post what he said in reply to us (though not to us first), and what we have to say in rebuttal. This document should be well worth reading.

While he did not answer the questions and Scriptures we provided, we will certainly reply to everything substantial he has sent to us, a worthwhile task for those interested in the Truth.

We do this for three reasons:

  • To provide wholesome bread from heaven for those who are granted to, and must, hear the truth in Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, Who gave His life for us and was raised from the dead, which Person we know and by Whom we speak;
  • To shut the mouths of the arrogant and false, who mislead by their presumptuous and pernicious ways, even as Enoch prophesied would be in the last days (Jude 1:14-16);
  • To show those given to know and to witness these things that we do have answers to men in their darkness, while our opponents have none, and know nothing as they think to know.

Thus are the false exposed and the true made manifest. As our beloved brother in Christ, Paul, declared to the Corinthians:

“Factions have to exist in order to make it clear who the genuine believers among you are” (1 Corinthians 11:19 GW).

Now hear this: Whereas most of our adversaries at least have had some kind of dialogue with us prior to denouncing us in public, this fellow went directly to the public to condemn us, and then later let us know he did so.

Not good for him, but no problem for us. We had wondered how we would expose this fellow for what he is, and now God has provoked him to serve his own head to us on a platter, so that we might publicly dispose of him in short order, though in much detail to make his error perfectly evident to those who have eyes to see, ears to hear, and hearts to understand, by God’s grace.

Mr. Watt claims to be the present day standard-bearer for the 1948 “Visitation of God” in North Battleford, Saskatchewan, Canada. In that event, God was supposed to have visited the people in a great, powerful, historically-exceptional way. However, according to Mr. Watt, man’s unrighteousness was more than a match for God, so He failed.

According to Mr. Watt, therefore, the apostle Paul was either a liar or a deceiver when he said that where sin abounds, grace abounds more (Romans 5:20). In essence, Mr. Watt concludes the “work of God” was short-circuited by false doctrines of men.

Back to the drawing board! Where God failed, He has allegedly left instructions for a super comeback any time now through the cleverness of a spiritually- astute knight in shining armor, namely Mr. Watt, successor to the man Mr. Watt considers a failure (Mr. George Hawtin), but who posthumously appointed Mr. Watt to show the way to final victory by the alleged “12 Embryonic Revival Principles of 1948.” Mr. Watt claims the Lord said to him in 1992, “The maturation of the 12 Embryonic Revival Principles of 1948 would be Parameters of Safety prior to the last Visitation before My Son returns.

What hooey! And in and by the Spirit of the Lord we will prove it, Lord willing, but for now, let’s get to Mr. Watt’s document and address it from beginning to end.

Mr. Watt begins with, “In July 1992 following a 5 week trip to Jerusalem and Israel, I received a vision.

What does going to Israel and Jerusalem have to do with receiving a vision? So what if he went to Israel and Jerusalem? Who should care? You will find that Mr. Watt is in the habit of using any and every fleshly thing to promote himself and his credibility before men. It is often a pitiful thing to witness men grow old without substance, having served their own bellies, waiting for the appearance of glory and failing with longing hearts. As the Scriptures declare:

“The hoary head is a crown of glory, if it be found in the way of righteousness” (Proverbs 16:31 KJV).

The opposite is also true.

He then writes (concerning the vision he claims to have had): “In it God appeared to me in the person of one of His departed servants.” Read anywhere in Scripture and if God appeared, then God appeared and not a man. On the other hand, if a man appeared in a dream or vision, such as the man from Macedonia to Paul (Acts 16), then it was a man and not God. Mr. Watt tries so hard to establish divine credibility, but only succeeds to discredit himself.

He goes on to use an example that only proves my point, mentioning King Saul’s attempt to contact Samuel through a witch. Saul knew God would not speak to him, so he deliberately tried another way to get in touch through Samuel, the late prophet of God. Samuel appeared in a vision as a man and not as God. So if George Hawtin did appear to Jim Watt, he could hardly claim it was God Who appeared to him, but he does.

Here is the part that becomes more difficult for many to understand, yet I will promptly give you the simple understanding if you have a heart for it, Lord willing. Watt claims that God is directing him to develop or maturate some “12 embryonic revival principles” left for him by George Hawtin, which allegedly match the meanings of the names of each of the 12 tribes of Israel.

Watt claims that by doing this, there will be an ushering in of true spiritual revival that will complete the intended work God had in mind in 1948, but failed to accomplish for lack of possession or understanding or maturation at that time of these principles.

Here is the simple, godly Scriptural understanding: Nowhere will you find in the Bible that God calls one to intellectually understand some complex (or even not so complex) concept or concepts in order to bring about a spiritual revival or anything else, for that matter. He did not do that with Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, or any other man. (Abraham is known as our father in the faith, and if anyone should have an intellectual grasp of important knowledge, it should be the father, should it not?)

God did not even do that with Moses, though it might be argued otherwise. Moses had nothing to match up symbolically or comprehend. He delivered the Law, which people were not to figure out but simply obey; obeying, they would do well. God does not make it complex or mystical in the way that one must study and help others to understand. A child can understand the will of God.

The two major principles of walking with God are faith and obedience. Jesus said this, and it applies today as it did in Adam’s, Enoch’s, Noah’s, and Moses’ day:

“At that time Jesus answered and said, I thank You, O Father, Lord of Heaven and earth, because You have hidden these things from the sophisticated and cunning, and revealed them to babes. Even so, Father, for so it seemed good in Your sight” (Matthew 11:25-26 MKJV).

If these words did not apply to Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, and the Israelites, then they don’t apply to anyone. Jesus’ Words are ever applicable, being eternal truth. Babes do not study or need manuals.

And consider the most complete spiritual turnaround ever seen in this world (foreshadowing the work of Christ that will reconcile all things to God), which came at the preaching of Jonah at Nineveh. Every last one of the Ninevites (heathen unbelievers) turned to God in solemn repentance. After this glorious event, God asked Jonah why He should not have mercy on this multitude who couldn’t tell their right hand from their left.

The work of salvation has nothing to do with man’s cleverness or mental comprehension of doctrinal teachings.

Mr. Watt is into man’s pride, wisdom, and sufficiency apart from God, though in God’s Name (which makes it worse). He writes, concerning some of the gifts of the Spirit:

But on May 31st of this year, the Day of Pentecost, following a word of ministry I gave on the importance of ‘Meditation’ based on the Word of God – a fellow pastor from Canada gave me a gift of ‘Dreams: The Divinity Code’ – The Keys to Decoding your Dreams and Visions by Adrian Beale and Adam F. Thompson of Australia.

Mr. Watt also writes of Beale and Thompson:

Following a 10 chapter ‘help’ in dream and vision interpretation, they have then added 101 Sample Dream and Vision Interpretations, based on a Metaphor Dictionary of some 2000 most common Biblically based Metaphors, and also a People and Place Name Dictionary.

These people presume that by studying a manual, one may learn to interpret dreams from God. One of the gifts of the Spirit is spiritual interpretation, be it of tongues, dreams, or visions. These are gifts, freely given of God. They do not require studying a manual of man; they do not require the wisdom, education, or cleverness of man.

Read what was said of Daniel, a man of God who was able to interpret dreams. Concerning the need to interpret a dream that King Nebuchadnezzar had, here is what Daniel did:

Daniel 2:17-20 MKJV
(17) Then Daniel went to his house and made the thing known to Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah, his companions,
(18) that they might pray for the mercies of God in Heaven concerning this secret, that Daniel and his companions should not perish with the rest of the wise men of Babylon.
(19) Then the secret was revealed to Daniel in a night vision. And Daniel blessed the God of Heaven.
(20) Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the Name of God forever and ever, for wisdom and might are His.

Or consider Joseph, another Biblical saint Mr. Watt mentions to be gifted in interpreting dreams and visions without Mr. Beale’s and Mr. Thompson’s “How To” manual or “Metaphor Dictionary”:

“And Pharaoh said to Joseph, I have dreamed a dream, and none can interpret it. And I have heard it about you, saying, you can understand a dream to interpret it. And Joseph answered Pharaoh, saying, Not I. God shall answer the welfare of Pharaoh” (Genesis 41:15-16 MKJV).

Immediately upon hearing the dream from the Pharaoh, Joseph gave the interpretation and counsel as to what needed to be done (Genesis 41).

Did Pharaoh say to him, “Do you have a manual or a method of some kind to correctly interpret dreams and visions? Can you teach me? Can we set up a school for my counselors?” No, here is what Pharaoh acknowledged to be the secret of Joseph’s spiritual gift:

“And Pharaoh said to his servants, Can we find any man like this, in whom the Spirit of God is? And Pharaoh said to Joseph, Since God has shown you all this, no one is as discreet and wise as you. You shall be over my house, and all my people shall kiss the hand at your word. Only in the throne will I be greater than you” (Genesis 41:38-40 MKJV).

God got the glory, as He well should – not Joseph (though he shared it with God), not Beale and Thompson, not a manual or dictionary, not man’s ingenuity, not training or education or knowledge or methodology of the use of metaphors and symbols. Those are the stuff of stuffy men and their carnal wisdom and calculating devices; they are not the stuff of the Spirit of God and revelation.

Yes, God uses metaphors, and the Bible is full of them, but what Bible did Joseph use to get 2,000 metaphors when yet living in the first book of the Bible? What manual did he consult when interpreting the dreams of the chief butler and baker in the prison (Genesis 40)? Who got the glory?

“And they said to him, We have dreamed a dream, and there is no interpreter of it. And Joseph said to them, Do not interpretations belong to God? Now tell it to me” (Genesis 40:8 MKJV).

It was not about studying principles or manuals. It was about faith in the Living God and dependence upon Him to make known spiritual secrets. Mr. Watt vaunts himself, making himself out to be some great one who understands deep things. He does all this to impress flesh, leading people astray from the One True God and the Way to approach Him.

Mr. Beale, Mr. Thompson, and Mr. Watt do not understand the ways of God, because they have not received the Spirit of God, I solemnly assure you. These men feed from the Tree of Knowledge and not from the Tree of Life. They savor the things that are of men; they serve the serpent and not the Savior.

It is heresy, which, simply put, is departing from the faith of the Son of God and influencing others to do the same. That is precisely Mr. Watt’s great sin. And he calls us heretics?

Of this supposedly valuable manual by Beale and Thompson on deciphering dreams and visions of God, Watt writes: “God led them to prepare the above text over a 4 year period, based on true Evangelical and Bible-grounded background, and made it available in 2008.

Mr. Watt sorely contradicts himself. In the years before this manual became available, he said he prospered in interpreting visions and dreams as did Joseph and Daniel (who had no manuals). He goes on to say that he could not find proper sources of teaching on interpreting visions and dreams so he quit teaching in this area.

Was he prospering, or was he not? If he was so able to prosper, why did he cease to teach the prosperous thing? Why didn’t he write a manual, if such should be done, seeing he compares his spiritual prowess to that of Joseph and Daniel? Instead, he quit!

Mr. Watt, who can believe you? The answer is that while fools can and will, those who worship the Lord in spirit and in truth cannot and will not believe you.

May I ask how believers managed all these millennia without the Beale-Thompson manual? Or were there no dreams and visions worthwhile to interpret until recently? (A rhetorical question – there were many.) If Mr. Watt ceased teaching on dreams and visions because he could not find proper resources for method of interpretation, then we can only conclude that his dreams, visions, and interpretations were all hooey, products of the flesh or of devils, including seeing Mr. Hawtin, who supposedly appointed him.

Mr. Watt presumes to be the man chosen of God to usher in the final great revival, but he couldn’t find a book to interpret his dreams and visions?

Did Moses have to go around looking for a man to teach him before he delivered the Israelites out of Egypt?

Did Gideon use a manual to bring revival to Israel during the Midianite oppression?

Did Samson avail himself of a structural engineer’s manual before bringing down the great public house upon the 3,000 Philistine lords and ladies and all that were in it?

What man taught David, son of Jesse, in the gifts of the Spirit before he became King of Israel?

What man taught John the Immerser to hear the Voice of God and to discern the Lamb of God? Was John studying a manual in the wilderness?

What man taught Paul the apostle to have a living relationship with God? “Immediately I conferred not with flesh and blood” he declared, concerning his divine relationship.

As a man of God, he did not have a man to teach him the “12 embryonic revival principles matching the 12 tribes of Israel” in order to usher in a revival. Truly, Mr. Watt’s notions are abominable to God.

1 Corinthians 2:4-6 MKJV
(4) And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man’s wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
(5) so that your faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.
(6) But, we speak wisdom among those who are perfect; yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the rulers of this world, that come to nothing.

1 Corinthians 2:13-14 MKJV
(13) These things we also speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
(14) But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Mr. Watt, you are a “natural man,” a phony “spiritual man,” a pleaser of men, a flatterer, a dreamer, an evil surmiser, a religious nobody looking to be a spiritual somebody. You are a wannabe man of God, without substance, and we are here to expose you. Will you repent?

Mr. Watt writes about supposed error taking over the short-lived alleged 1948 North Battleford revival: “Following that, Ultimate Reconciliation crept in (successfully confronted by Derek Prince and George Muller of Bristol, England)….

We Scripturally, reasonably, and effectively proved Derek Prince’s refutation of the doctrine of Ultimate Reconciliation to be error (see Satan’s Redemption). We submitted the paper to Mr. Watt. I highly doubt he red the paper; he saw the title, presumed he knew what we were saying and, without further investigation, condemned us.

Now for the famed George Müller.

Great Signs and Wonders

May there be those who will understand the truth that the enemy comes with awesome power and an impressive form of godliness, even as spoken of by the Lord Jesus Christ:

“For false Christs and false prophets will arise and show great signs and wonders; so much so that, if it were possible, they would deceive even the elect” (Matthew 24:24 MKJV).

You will now see a very good example of such a deceiver, someone Mr. Watt highly commends. George Müller is famously reputed in nominal Christendom to have done great works for God through faith. He has been an enigma to me for decades. I thought, “Surely, given his great accomplishments, he unquestionably must have been a great man of God.”

I did not seek after the Lord about him, because he was not really an issue. Mr. Watt has taken care of that now. We have sought the Lord, and we have our answer.

The question is, “Why does Mr. Watt use another man by which to measure others and that which they teach?” Does Mr. Watt not have his own oil? Is he not aware that the Scriptures teach that no man is righteous and should, therefore, never be used as a standard of righteousness? Is he not aware that any man can be wrong?

Even David, the father of the Messiah, was wrong. Solomon, the wisest man that ever lived, was wrong. Why measure my doctrine, then, by Mr. Müller? Why does Mr. Watt not measure my doctrine by the Scriptures and by revelation of God?

The answers to these questions are plain for those who can receive them – Mr. Watt does not have it in himself to receive instruction and revelation from the Lord. He is, at best, among the five foolish virgins, being without his own oil, and at worst, he is a pretentious, sycophantic crowd pleaser, one who revels in that which is highly esteemed among men so as to gain their favor. He does so to build his own kingdom in the name of building God’s Kingdom. He values the praise of men over the praise of God:

“For they loved the glory of men more than the glory of God” (John 12:43 MKJV).

We now go on record to declare that Mr. Müller has deceived almost all those professing faith in evangelical Christianity. He was not a man of God. He was rather a thief of God’s glory, while appearing otherwise, and we will prove it.

We will be hated by many for this declaration of George Müller. If we have had any credibility with anyone, it will surely be with fewer now. But isn’t it remarkable that when Satan comes with all power, signs, and lying wonders to deceive the very elect, if it were possible, people are deceived, saying, “Surely, this must be of God!” It simply does not occur to them that Satan comes as an angel of light and his ministers are transformed into ministers of Christ and of righteousness, even as our brother Paul warned would be so:

“For such ones are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ. Did not even Satan marvelously transform himself into an angel of light? Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also transform themselves as ministers of righteousness, whose end shall be according to their works” (2 Corinthians 11:13-15 MKJV).

“And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the breath of His mouth and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming, whose coming is according to the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders, and with all deceit of unrighteousness in those who perish, because they did not receive the love of the truth, so that they might be saved” (2 Thessalonians 2:8-10 MKJV).

Paul goes on to write:

“And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie, so that all those who do not believe the truth, but delight in unrighteousness, might be condemned” (2 Thessalonians 2:11-12 MKJV).

We say God has sent strong delusion to all those who cannot tell the difference between the false and the true. When God sends strong delusion, who can resist? Will those who are deluded not declare that which is false to be true?

John the Immerser came performing not one miracle. It took the sheer gift of faith to believe John. Only those given true faith could believe him because in himself, he had nothing to offer. But Müller is another story. Imagine how little faith was required to believe George Müller with all the daily miracles and works. Who could argue?

In spite of the testimony of Scripture, which Mr. Watt would profess to receive and preach, he glorifies a man with statistics and the accomplishments of man:

Now hear the position of George Muller, one who before the 20th Century prayed in $8 million to support 10,000 orphans; over 170 missionaries; Bible, Book and tract distribution in large numbers; Sunday schools, Day schools, Adult Schools both in England and abroad; a church of over 1200 members in 5 locations in Bristol, and many others started from these – and untold numbers of souls saved, including 1000’s of his orphans – and all this without ever telling one soul of his needs, nor ever asking for a penny! Over 50,000 specific answers to prayer are recorded in his Journal of over one million words. Tell me, would God have honored such a man as this if he was in error like my 2 friends mentioned above?

This all sounds great, does it not? But is it of God? “How can it not be?” you may ask. Yet Isaiah said: “But we are all as the unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as a menstruation cloth. And we all fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away” (Isaiah 64:6 MKJV).

Obviously, Mr. Watt does not believe Isaiah, or he would not applaud men for their works rather than giving glory and praise to God. (Please understand and believe – we are not attempting to prove Mr. Müller wrong in order to prove ourselves right – we have no need for such skullduggery. Mr. Müller isn’t even the issue here.)

“Concerning the works of men, by the Words of Your lips, I am kept from the paths of the destroyer” (Psalms 17:4 MKJV).

Jesus said: “You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God” (Luke 16:15 MKJV).

Jesus did not come preaching a social gospel of good works. He did not come to meet the physical needs of the world. He never once urged His disciples to do so. He taught and trained them to preach the gospel for the changing of the heart – knowing that, with a heart change, all else would fall into place automatically.

Was Mr. Müller preaching the gospel? It would appear so, but it also appears that Billy Graham has done the same (as many others), and God has plainly revealed to me that Billy Graham is a false minister, a man who has never known the Lord, a man who has deceived and misled very many souls.

But Mr. Watt would not know that. He would most likely defend Billy Graham as a great man of God. He would be wrong, but he would likely praise Billy Graham and other false teachers as well. No, let God reveal who is of Him and who is not. Let us not do what the Lord plainly told us not to do:

“Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment” (John 7:24 KJV).

Amazingly, Mr. Watt uses the very principles of judgment condemned by the Lord and by the apostle Paul, as I have shown. He credits George Müller with the very kind of credentials Paul forsook and counted as dung (Philippians 3:3-11):

Besides this, Muller was fluent in English, German and French, and during his World Tours from the age of 70 to 87, he ministered either in these 3 languages, or through interpreters. He was an excellent scholar in Latin, Hebrew and Greek, and had memorized much of the Old Testament in Hebrew. He used both Hebrew and Greek in his devotions much of the time. Tell me again – is such a man as this, who was reading the Bible through 4 to 5 times a year on his knees his last 15 years – going to be mistaken in such doctrines as Universalism – with such a background? I think not.

But the Lord says, by the vessel who counted these things as dung:

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and I will set aside the understanding of the perceiving ones” (1 Corinthians 1:19 MKJV).

1 Corinthians 1:27-29 MKJV
(27) But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God has chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
(28) and God has chosen the base things of the world, and things which are despised, and things which are not, in order to bring to nothing things that are;
(29) so that no flesh should glory in His presence.

“He who glories, let him glory in the Lord,” Paul concludes in that chapter, but Mr. Watt glories in the scholastic and intellectual skills and abilities of men, both those professing faith like Mr. Müller, and those like Mr. Thayer who profess none.

Mr. Müller was very mistaken on the doctrine of universal reconciliation.

Mr. Watt writes of this doctrine, using Mr. Müller as support:

In 1844 at the age of 39, George Muller visited Stuttgart, Germany and there ran into Universalism. Here I quote from page 190 of ‘George Muller of Bristol’ by Dr. A. T. Pierson – ‘A more serious and dangerous doctrine which it was needful to confront and confute was what Mr. Muller calls that ‘awful error,’ spread almost universally among believers in that land, that at last ‘all will be saved,’ not sinful men only, but ‘even the devils themselves.’

First, we are on record that we do not teach the ungodly erroneous doctrine of Universalism that is taught by so many others called “Universalists.” If any honest, truth-seeking reader would like to know what we do preach concerning universal reconciliation, he or she will read The Good News and Universalism – The False Kind, particularly The Deadly Error of the Universalists.

Second, there is nothing dangerous about our Biblical doctrine of the reconciliation of all things. On the contrary, it glorifies God and the sacrifice and victory of the Lord Jesus Christ, as it should.

If it is possible to give Mr. Müller any benefit of doubt, it could be that he was confronted with the error of Universalism and not with the full counsel of God as we teach. But we cannot give Mr. Watt any benefit of doubt because he has come out swinging at he knows not what. The Bible is clear on such conduct:

“Listen before you answer. If you don’t, you are being stupid and insulting” (Proverbs 18:13 GNB).

Third, here we go into the “doctor” thing again: “Dr. Pierson scornfully remarks of the doctrine of universal reconciliation ‘that at last all will be saved,’ not sinful men only, but ‘even the devils themselves.’

Let me ask Mr. Pierson and Mr. Watt a question: Is it only the righteous and not sinners that will be saved? Is that what Jesus came to do? Lay down His life for the righteous? As He said, “It is not the healthy, but the sick that need a physician” (Matthew 9:12).

But if he means that only those made righteous by faith of the Son of God, through His death and resurrection, will be saved, what makes him think the Lord will not succeed in finally bringing all men into the fold? Read The Restitution of All Things.

As for the devils being saved, why not? Isn’t that what the Word of God promises? Does anyone think God cannot or would not do so? If so, you trust in your own righteousness, even as did George Müller. And if you are right that devils cannot be saved, you are dead, forever. You have no hope.

We are thankful you are wrong, and you will also be thankful:

“And through Him having made peace through the blood of His cross, it pleased the Father to reconcile all things to Himself through Him, whether the things on earth or the things in Heaven” (Colossians 1:20 MKJV).

“For by grace you are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast” (Ephesians 2:8-9 MKJV).

Another argument from Mr. Müller against the reconciliation of all things through Christ is presented in Pierson’s book, quoted by Mr. Watt. Pierson quotes Müller disputing with some "brethren" on the matter:

In reference to universal salvation, I found that they had been led into this error because (1) They did not see the difference between the earthly calling of the Jews, and the heavenly calling of the believers in the Lord Jesus in the present dispensation, and therefore they said that, because the words ‘everlasting,’ etc., are applied to ‘the possession of the land of Canaan’ and the ‘priesthood of Aaron,’ therefore, the punishment of the wicked cannot be without end, seeing that the possession of Canaan and the priesthood of Aaron are not without end.

My endeavor, therefore, was to show the brethren the difference between the earthly calling of Israel and our heavenly one, and to prove from Scripture that, whenever the word ‘everlasting’ is used with reference to things purely not of the earth, but beyond time, it denotes a period without end.

Mr. Müller is confused, but worse than that, he is proud, insisting on correcting those who knew better than he did about the meaning of "everlasting." His "brethren" correctly interpreted the word to denote, not a length of time, but a thoroughness of agency that is applied to whatever the word "everlasting" qualifies.

For example, the "everlasting" Levitical priesthood fulfilled God’s purposes until Christ superseded it as a different kind of Priest, Whose offering cleanses from all sin with no further need of animal sacrifices.

Another example is the "everlasting" salvation God promised to Israel:

Isaiah 45:17-18 KJV
(17) But Israel shall be saved in the LORD with an everlasting salvation: you shall not be ashamed nor confounded world without end.
(18) For thus says the LORD that created the heavens; God Himself that formed the earth and made it; He has established it, He created it not in vain, He formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else.

The salvation of God is effectual, in other words, saving all of Israel entirely, world without end. So not only is Müller wrong about the meaning and application of "everlasting," he is also wrong about God’s sovereignty and power to perform what He promised to the descendants of Israel after the flesh.

Paul confirmed this promise of everlasting salvation to Israel, and also the fact that God’s plan is to show mercy to all people:

Romans 11:26-32 MKJV
(26) And so all Israel shall be saved; as it is written, "There shall come out of Zion the Deliverer, and He will turn away ungodliness from Jacob.
(27) For this is My covenant with them, when I have taken away their sins."
(28) Indeed as regards the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes. But as regards the election, they are beloved for the fathers’ sakes.
(29) For the free gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
(30) For as you also then disbelieved God, but now have been shown mercy through their disbelief,
(31) even so these also have not believed now, so that through your mercy they may also obtain mercy.
(32) For God has shut up all in unbelief, so that He might show mercy to all.

It is sheer nonsense and self-righteous wickedness for Müller to declare that physical Israel had only a temporary earthly calling while he has an eternal one, when it is the same God Who saves both Jew and Gentile. Müller is calling God a liar, because God has plainly declared that He will show everlasting kindness to Israel (which will not depart), and He will gather them to Himself in His everlasting Kingdom of peace:

Isaiah 54:5-10 KJV
(5) For your Maker is your husband; the LORD of hosts is His Name; and your Redeemer the Holy One of Israel; The God of the whole earth shall He be called.
(6) For the LORD has called you as a woman forsaken and grieved in spirit, and a wife of youth, when you were refused, says your God.
(7) For a small moment have I forsaken you; but with great mercies will I gather you.
(8) In a little wrath I hid My face from you for a moment; but with everlasting kindness will I have mercy on you, says the LORD your Redeemer.
(9) For this is as the waters of Noah unto Me: for as I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth; so have I sworn that I would not be wroth with you, nor rebuke you.
(10) For the mountains shall depart, and the hills be removed; but My kindness shall not depart from you, neither shall the covenant of My peace be removed, says the LORD that has mercy on you.

God proved Müller (1805-1898) to be a liar by raising Israel from the ashes of history in the land He gave them and bringing them to the place where they will receive His judgment for their salvation (The Key for Israel and the Jew).

Müller says that any usage of “everlasting” in the Scriptures, which refers to something “purely not of the earth” denotes a period of time without end. This is simply more nonsense. Christ died for mankind, creatures made from the earth – “for God so loved the world” – therefore, what substantive matters addressed by God in the Scriptures do not have some connection with the earth?

Mr. Watt, thoroughly taken in by all this self-righteous religious posturing, writes of George Müller’s spirit and conduct with those he thought to be in error:

Calmly and courteously, but firmly and courageously, these and kindred errors were met with the plain witness of the Word. Refutation of false teaching aroused a spirit of bitterness in opposers of the truth, and, as is too often the case, faithful testimony was the occasion of acrimony; but the Lord stood by His servant and so strengthened him that he was kept both faithful and peaceful.

Again, he commends men – he commends them after the appearance, and he commends them by virtues that the world itself, though without Christ, can and does practice publicly and privately, professionally and casually.

Furthermore, in his judgment of virtue, he would condemn Moses for commanding the Levites to slay their brethren for their idolatry and fornication; Samuel for hewing Agag to pieces with the sword; Samson for slaying many Philistines; David, the father of the Messiah, for slaying his ten thousands; Solomon for slaying his brother; Elijah for beheading 450 prophets of Baal; Elisha for cursing a young crowd, causing 42 of them to be immediately slain by bears; Paul for sharply rebuking Peter publicly; and Paul for rendering a sorcerer (Elymas) blind by a prophetic curse.

By judging after the appearance, Mr. Watt also condemns Jesus Christ for angrily driving out merchandisers and livestock from the Temple court with a whip of cords and publicly sharply rebuking the “famed scholars” – the Pharisees, Sadducees, scribes, doctors, and lawyers.

These all trusted in their scholastic abilities to be in favor with both God and man, just as does Mr. Watt and his company. They were Christ’s enemies, and Watt and company are today’s enemies of Christ and those who are His chosen. Watt and company are the sons of their fathers, who accuse, condemn, and kill the just in the sweetest of manner.

Mr. Watt writes:

To see the pros and cons of this Visitation, the Precious and the Vile, you can order 3 DVD’s produced by Dr. John Roddam of St. Luke’s Episcopal Church of Seattle (the church of Dennis Bennett fame)….

Here he appeals to famous men again, this time, Dennis Bennett, who also was a sensationalist and deceiver in the deceptive mainline nominal Christian Charismatic movement. He appeals to his readers by “doctors of theology,” in this case, “Dr.” John Roddam, who smear such credentials in their books and on the walls of their offices and homes.

But what did Paul the apostle do with such credentials after meeting Jesus Christ? He flushed them down the toilet, because he well knew what those credentials were, as highlighted in this passage:

Philippians 3:3-11 MKJV
(3) For we are the circumcision who worship God in the spirit and rejoice in Christ Jesus and have no confidence in the flesh;
(4) though I might also have confidence in the flesh. If any other thinks that he has reason to trust in the flesh, I more.
(5) I was circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews. As regards the Law, I was a Pharisee;
(6) concerning zeal, persecuting the church; regarding the righteousness in the Law, blameless.
(7) But whatever things were gain to me, those I counted loss for Christ.
(8) But no, rather, I also count all things to be loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whose sake I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them to be dung, so that I may win Christ
(9) and be found in Him; not having my own righteousness, which is of the Law, but through the faith of Christ, the righteousness of God by faith,
(10) that I may know Him and the power of His resurrection and the fellowship of His sufferings, being made conformable to His death;
(11) if by any means I might attain to the resurrection of the dead.

As for the Episcopal Church, read The True Marks of a Cult. We can guarantee you that our brother, the beloved physician Luke, the writer of the gospel, had nothing whatsoever to do with “St. Luke’s Episcopal Church.” Naming it after Luke is an insult to him, to God, and to all the saints in Christ Jesus. They have nothing whatsoever to do with Mystery, the harlot.

Mr. Watt points not to Jesus Christ or to the saints and testimonies of Scripture, but to intellectuals like Derek Prince, Beale, and Thompson, religious heroes like the doctors of theology – Dr. John Roddam, Dennis Bennett, and George Müller, and all their impressive works. These may be impressive to men, but not to God:

“And He said to them, You are those who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts. For that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God” (Luke 16:15 MKJV).

Now for those things Mr. Watt specifically spoke against us. He wrote:

Recently I received a phone call from Montana. A believer here has teamed up with a friend in Alberta, and together they have constructed a Website that will effectively lead any astray who swallow the legalistic and unscriptural positions set forth. So many sound teachers such as Derek Prince are raked over the coals by these two brothers. They unfortunately have latched unto the majority of the 7 aberrations that slowly moved into and killed the 1948 Visitation: Ultimate Reconciliation and Replacement Theology being but two of them. Beware of <www.thepathoftruth.com> the Website of these two deceived brothers.

I do not think of Moses and Aaron as teaming up one with the other. God brought them together for the great work to which He appointed them. So it is with us. We did not team up, as this carnal man puts it. I was sent to Israel in 1979 to speak to Paul the Word of the Lord to set him back on a true course with the Lord, from which he had strayed and was lost.

In the mid ‘80’s, the Lord spoke to me and said that He had given me Paul as He had given Aaron to Moses. Our ministry together did not begin until we had entered the rest of God beginning in 2000 for me and about 2003 for Paul. Now we speak to all the earth from heaven.

Mr. Watt calls our teachings “legalistic and unscriptural,” but gives no evidence. In his arrogance, the readers are expected to take his word for it.

We have not expected anyone to take our word for anything. We expect them to believe the Truth, and we are able to substantiate, in detail, why what we speak is true and why what we condemn is false. Still, we are fully aware that, except for the grace of God, no man will understand the simplest of truths.

Mr. Watt accuses us of “Replacement Theology” (the doctrine that physical Israel is forever cast off and replaced by the Church since the first Pentecost after Christ’s ascension). We have no idea how he could come to that conclusion (we are innocent of that charge, as with all his others), but that is the way of the false accuser and his minions. He is, at best, careless and irresponsible; at worst, a liar and false accuser.

Don’t take our word for it; go to the site Mr. Watt gives of us and see for yourself if Mr. Watt opens his mouth in truth or error. Do we teach “Replacement Theology,” or do we not?

And Mr. Watt presumes to be the one to bring in the final great revival by “12 Embryonic Revival Principles”? We don’t think so!

And what is this about a great revival before the coming of the Lord? What foolishness! What lies! Jesus Himself asked this rhetorical question:

“Yet when the Son of Man comes, shall He find faith on the earth?” (Luke 18:8 MKJV)

Did not the apostle Paul prophesy that in the very end there would be not a revival, but a great falling away?

2 Thessalonians 2:1-4 MKJV
(1) Now we beseech you, my brothers, with regard to the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ and our gathering together to Him,
(2) that you should not be soon shaken in mind or troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word or letter, as through us, as if the Day of Christ is at hand.
(3) Let not anyone deceive you by any means. For that Day shall not come unless there first comes a falling away, and the man of sin shall be revealed, the son of perdition,
(4) who opposes and exalts himself above all that is called God, or that is worshiped, so that he sits as God in the temple of God, setting himself forth, that he is God.

So what is this about some kind of “revival” precipitated by the “maturation of the 12 embryonic revival principles”? These are the lies of false teachers seeking preeminence among men at the cost of the Truth. This is the manifest folly and exposure of the man of sin who exalts himself above all that is called God by setting forth his carnal agenda as though he were God.

Again, Mr. Watt declares that the alleged 1948 visitation of God was “killed” by error. You see? Mr. Watt needs to find the True God, the One Who is ever victorious in all He does, the One Who overcame death itself; “having stripped rulers and authorities, He made a show of them publicly, triumphing over them in it” (Colossians 2:15 MKJV).

Halleluyah! Now there is The God we serve! He is risen from the dead, death having no more power over Him – or over us, because we are filled with His Spirit and His Resurrection Power! Praise be to our Glorious Savior!

Mr. Watt serves the deceiver, the loser, the thief, the failure, the murderer who poses as God. He believes on the one who will never succeed, even if granted full opportunity:

Revelation 20:7-9 MKJV
(7) And when the thousand years have expired, Satan will be loosed out of his prison.
(8) And he will go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle. The number of them is as the sand of the sea.
(9) And they went up over the breadth of the earth and circled around the camp of the saints, and the beloved city. And fire came down from God out of Heaven and devoured them.

No, God’s work is never “killed.” Men’s works will always perish in the trials by fire. That which occurred in 1948 in North Battleford was the work of men. Fires came, tried those works, and found them to be but hay and stubble:

“For any other foundation can no one lay than the one being laid, Who is Jesus Christ. And if anyone builds on this foundation gold, silver, precious stones, wood, hay, stubble, each one’s work shall be revealed. For the Day shall declare it, because it shall be revealed by fire; and the fire shall try each one’s work as to what kind it is” (1 Corinthians 3:11-13 MKJV).

Those men trusted in their own prayer, their own faith, their own righteousness, their own ability to hear God’s voice, their own power to grab hold of God and to follow through on something they believed Him to be doing. They trusted in their own understanding. They trusted in their own finite knowledge. They ate from the Tree of Knowledge. They were religious, and their religiosity failed them, as it would and only could.

God did not fail with Moses and Aaron. God did not fail with Gideon. He did not fail with Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Samuel, Job, Jonah, or with anyone else. He never fails!

He has done all He ever purposed to perform, and He will finally bring the creation of the entire human race to a perfectly successful conclusion, contrary to the diabolical doctrines of Mr. Jim Watt and company.

Even Mr. Watt, with all his pomp and error, will come on bended knee to worship the Lord Jesus Christ in spirit and in truth, not only with the lips, but with a new heart.

He better hope all will be saved; otherwise, he will not be among the saved. The only reason he thinks he is among the saved now is because he thinks to have more Christian knowledge, experience, and virtue than many. He is deluded.

Until Mr. Watt comes to know the Lord Jesus Christ, his mouth will only spew error and nothing more. He will expose himself at every turn, even as he continues in this revealing portion:

Concerning Ultimate Reconciliation or Universalism: a lady approached Dr. Thayer of Greek Lexicon fame and asked him, ‘Dr. Thayer, I am confused over the nature of hell and its duration. Could you help me on this?’ His answer was, ‘There are 4 adjectives relating to hell or Gehenna, the Lake of Fire. One is AIon, age; next aiON, ages; then AIon of aiON, age of ages; and lastly aiON of aiON, ages of the ages.

‘These same 4 adjectives are also applied to God in the Greek New Testament. So however long God exists, so will hell.’

‘Why Dr. Thayer,’ she replied, ‘that makes it so simple and understandable. Why don’t you preach and teach it?’ My dear lady”, he responded, ‘I am a Unitarian, and do not believe the Bible. But if you are a God and Bible believer, then you have no choice but to believe it and present it in the same clarity as God through His Spirit has presented it here.’

I personally believe that sometimes the testimony of enemies is even more powerful than that of our friends! This is an example.

One, Mr. Watt honors the words of one who calls God a liar (he does not believe the Bible). What does the Bible have to say about such men?

“For who among men knows the things of a man except the spirit of man within him? So also no one knows the things of God except the Spirit of God. But we have not received the spirit of the world, but the Spirit from God, so that we might know the things that are freely given to us by God” (1 Corinthians 2:11-12 MKJV).

According to this record, the “famous” Mr. Thayer did not believe the Bible, and neither does the man who would like to be famous – Mr. Watt.

Two, did or did not Mr. Thayer believe the God of the Bible? Did he not say to the lady, “you have no choice but to believe it and present it in the same clarity as God through His Spirit has presented it here”? Is this not confusion?

Three, if not a believer (and no believer would deny the Bible’s authority), did Mr. Thayer indeed make it so “simple and understandable” to the lady? Not according to the Bible:

“But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Corinthians 2:14 MKJV).

Mr. Watt also calls God a liar and testifies of the understanding of a foolish woman who believes a man who calls God a liar.

Four, any person who can believe one who refutes the Bible cannot believe God Who wrote the Bible. As Paul said:

“Let it not be! But let God be true, and every man a liar; as it is written, ‘That You might be justified in Your sayings, and will overcome when You are judged’” (Romans 3:4 MKJV).

Mr. Watt and his lady friend would choose a liar’s intellectual prowess and testimony rather than the Truth of God. They cite educated liars and fools to compensate for their lack of understanding of the things of God. But again, what does God say?

“These things we also speak, not in words which man’s wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Spirit teaches, comparing spiritual things with spiritual. But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Corinthians 2:13-14 MKJV).

Mr. Watt, you call Victor Hafichuk and Paul Cohen deceivers because you call God a deceiver. You do not believe the testimony of the Scriptures, the declaration of men of God, who speak by His Spirit. You call us liars because…you are a liar.

You say, “I personally believe that sometimes the testimony of enemies is even more powerful than that of our friends! This is an example.

Indeed, you do believe so, and the only reason why you would ever believe your friends is because they are also in darkness, enemies of God, as lost as Mr. Thayer. If your friends spoke the truth, as we do, you would not believe them, even as you do not believe us. You would no longer call them your friends, but deceivers, as you do us for speaking the truth.

What does the Bible have to say about the famed Mr. Thayer’s scholastic definitions? We and others, by the Scriptures, have proven Mr. Thayer’s reasonings to be foolishness, as wise and sound as they may appear on the surface – The True, Scriptural Meanings of “Forever,” “Everlasting,” and “Hell.” But Mr. Watt has no use for the “foolishness” of God. He prefers the “wisdom” of men:

“Because the foolish thing of God is wiser than men, and the weak thing of God is stronger than men” (1 Corinthians 1:25 MKJV).

“But God has chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God has chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty; and God has chosen the base things of the world, and things which are despised, and things which are not, in order to bring to nothing things that are; so that no flesh should glory in His presence” (1 Corinthians 1:27-29 MKJV).

Preferring the praise of men, Mr. Watt has no respect for God’s thoughts and ways:

“For you see your calling, brothers, that not many wise men according to the flesh are called, not many mighty, not many noble” (1 Corinthians 1:26 MKJV).

“So that no flesh should glory in His presence. But of Him you are in Christ Jesus, Who of God is made to us wisdom and righteousness and sanctification and redemption; so that, according as it is written, ‘He who glories, let him glory in the Lord’” (1 Corinthians 1:29-31 MKJV).

Mr. Watt then takes another silly, ignorant jab at us: “Hear: – let not your life be led astray by those who think they are scholars and teachers – but are not.

First, who says we must be scholars to preach the truth? People marveled that Jesus spoke with authority and great knowledge, yet He had no education. He was not a scholar. Did He choose scholars for disciples? The Holy Record says otherwise:

“But seeing the boldness of Peter and John, and perceiving that they were unlearned and uneducated men, they marveled. And they recognized them, that they had been with Jesus” (Acts 4:13 MKJV).

Of John the Immerser, Jesus said:

“Truly I say to you, Among those who have been born of women there has not risen a greater one than John the Baptist” (Matthew 11:11 MKJV).

So how is it he came to be so great? Had he been to seminary receiving his doctorate in theology? Here is what God says of John:

“And you, child, will be called the prophet of the Highest, for you shall go before the face of the Lord to prepare His ways, to give knowledge of salvation to His people by the remission of their sins, through the tender mercy of our God; by which the Dayspring from on high has visited us, to give light to those who sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace. And the child grew and became strong in spirit and was in the deserts until the day of his showing to Israel” (Luke 1:76-80 MKJV).

Do you think John had a “Metaphor Dictionary” and a manual for interpreting dreams and visions? Did he even have an education?

Plainly, Mr. Watt places his confidence squarely in the flesh, which is condemned by the Lord:

Romans 8:5-8 MKJV
(5) For they who are according to the flesh mind the things of flesh, but they who are according to the Spirit the things of the Spirit.
(6) For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace
(7) because the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can it be.
(8) So then they who are in the flesh cannot please God.

Second, we are not scholars and do not claim to be scholars.

Mr. Watt writes of us:

I have shared their Website and teaching with sober, spiritual, Word-oriented friends, and their unanimous conclusion is – ‘Don’t waste your time with such mistaken, proud and arrogant would-be and so-called teachers!’

We are hated by mainstream orthodox Christianity, the Pharisee sect of the modern day. You know what happened to them within a generation’s duration of the Lord ascending into heaven. It will not take as long this time.

Mark our words for Mr. Watt and his foolish counselors. In 1977, God spoke by me saying He is finished winking. He said the same in 1984, in 1991, and in 1998. Watch and see if He is not fed up to the full and will take no more.

Mr. Watt continues his boast in the flesh to impress upon us his assumed credibility:

I have personally copied out by hand the Greek New Testament, and typed in a good English translation by Ivan Panin. I have spent well over 60,000 hours in outlining God’s Numeric Interlinear Greek and English New Testament, and have led in over 40,000 hours of Greek Word studies of the major NT words, based on the same, plus Englishman’s Greek Concordance and John Stegenga’s Greek Lexicon.

All dung in God’s sight – self-righteousness at its worst.

Now he drops his pants, displaying his shocking nakedness for all to see that have eyes to see:

George Hawtin of North Battleford looked over my shoulder in 1948 when at the age of 25 I was already involved in this, 61 years ago – and said, ‘I wish to God, Jimmy, that I could do what you do.’ I thought – ‘What will happen to this movement if you don’t?’ The 3 DVD’s mentioned above tell this sad part of the story.

No! Age 25? You don’t say! Almost a child prodigy even! But what does Mr. Watt say to Mr. Hawtin? He tells him that unless Mr. Hawtin gets with Greek word studies, concordances, and lexicons, God will fail!

Jesus was so foolish in choosing ignorant fishermen as a third of the apostleship with likely most of the other two thirds being unlearned men! Surely, Mr. Watt would have chosen men more "qualified" than Peter or John!

Again, what of the apostle Paul? Paul was a learned man who studied under the “famed” Gamaliel and possessed many of the scholastic privileges, accomplishments, and credentials of his day. But he trashed them all when he met the Lord.

For my part, I would far rather meet the Lord than a Greek Lexicon; I would far rather have His Mind than a clever, knowledgeable intellect – the carnal mind that is at enmity with Him:

“For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace because the carnal mind is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the Law of God, neither indeed can it be” (Romans 8:6-7 MKJV).

Let the reader take note of how much Mr. Watt relies on Scripture by the frequency to which he refers to It, and mark how much he relies on references to what men say rather than to what God says. This point alone should settle your minds as to who is true and who is false.

“Then those who feared the LORD spoke to one another, and the LORD paid attention and listened. A book was written in His presence to be a reminder to those who feared the LORD and respected His Name. ‘They will be Mine,’ says the LORD of Armies. ‘On that day I will make them My special possession. I will spare them as a man spares his own son who serves him. Then you will again see the difference between righteous people and wicked people, between the one who serves God and the one who doesn’t serve Him’" (Malachi 3:16-18 GW).

Mr. Watt, you are deceived, boasting of the intellectual abilities of your carnal mind, which God condemns, while we trust in the Living God; yet you and your friends count us as “mistaken, proud, and arrogant”?

Go your way, then, Mr. Watt, you and your wife; destroy yourselves after living a spiritually useless, miserable life, albeit prospering in physical health, noteworthiness, and pride, and complete your calling as a false teacher to the end. But know that you have been found out and exposed before all.

The Son is here now, and this is your visitation. In Him, we go on record declaring that your “Parameters of Safety” the “12 Embryonic Principles of Revival” are but men’s concoctions, clever devices, carnally-devised formulae, broken reeds to lean upon, which will betray any who trust in them. They are not safe at all – woe to those who put their trust in you.

Truly, we are privileged to be instruments in the hands and mouth of our Savior and Lord to convince the ungodly and to burn their works by the fire of the Word of Truth, as unpleasant a job it is.

Enough is enough. He is indeed finished winking at your religious claptrap, and we are thankful to be His instruments of resurrection power to serve Him in this capacity. We know Him crucified, and we know Him resurrected. Amen!

Among the many of whom Enoch prophesied would come to do the job, along with Paul Cohen, my brother-in-arms for the Lord,

Victor Hafichuk

Print Friendly