Does the saying, “the Word was with God, and was God,” indicate two separate beings, or is it the description of One Being? The Bible tells us it’s the latter – the incarnation of God the Creator as Lord and Savior of all mankind. This is an open secret; open to those who seek to do the will of the One True God, and closed to those who want to know and define God on their own terms.
Paul Young constructs a shack built on the shifting sands of man’s thoughts passed off as “theology,” whereas God builds His House on the Sure Foundation of Truth in Jesus Christ, His Son. There is no compatibility or comparison.
You claim that those on your “false teachers” list come with their own teachings and not the Lord’s, yet you claim to have received extra-biblical revelations from God…hmmm…
There’s a significant difference between “extra-Biblical” and “anti-Biblical.” Nothing I speak or teach is anti-Biblical. And if you think God no longer personally relates to His children but by the Words of the Bible, as True as they are, then you have fallen into Bibliolatry, a subtle, yet powerfully destructive sin.
Lorna didn’t state that she thinks God no longer speaks today. You accuse her of falling into a ‘subtle yet powerfully destructive sin’which is unfounded. Somebody has questioned yourselves and you hit back with more negative rhetoric. I belive you have fallen into the subtle yet powerfully destructive sin of pride and judgement of your fellow brothers and sisters.
Victor Hafichuk here at my wife Marilyn’s computer:
Have I judged brothers and sisters in Christ or have I judged tares? The latter, I’m surely persuaded. You defend Lorna while she is the one entering in judging me without understanding or authority. If I’m wrong in interpreting what she is saying, then the two of you can clarify exactly her purpose and meaning. I will deal with it and render a judgment that is appropriate. Thus far, you only prove me to be right, Wendy. I judge righteous judgment as commanded. You two, on the other hand, are religious and unrealistic, enemies of the cross. Prove me wrong.
You claim that those on your “false teachers” list come with their own teachings and not the Lord’s, yet you claim to have received extra-biblical revelations from God…hmmm…
There’s a significant difference between “extra-Biblical” and “anti-Biblical.” Nothing I speak or teach is anti-Biblical. And if you think God no longer personally relates to His children but by the Words of the Bible, as True as they are, then you have fallen into Bibliolatry, a subtle, yet powerfully destructive sin.
Lorna didn’t state that she thinks God no longer speaks today. You accuse her of falling into a ‘subtle yet powerfully destructive sin’which is unfounded. Somebody has questioned yourselves and you hit back with more negative rhetoric. I belive you have fallen into the subtle yet powerfully destructive sin of pride and judgement of your fellow brothers and sisters.
Victor Hafichuk here at my wife Marilyn’s computer:
Have I judged brothers and sisters in Christ or have I judged tares? The latter, I’m surely persuaded. You defend Lorna while she is the one entering in judging me without understanding or authority. If I’m wrong in interpreting what she is saying, then the two of you can clarify exactly her purpose and meaning. I will deal with it and render a judgment that is appropriate. Thus far, you only prove me to be right, Wendy. I judge righteous judgment as commanded. You two, on the other hand, are religious and unrealistic, enemies of the cross. Prove me wrong.