Letter to Kurt McPherson

Letter sent to Kurt on March 29th, 2007 – Short Version:

Hi Kurt,

I have had some thoughts on our discussion last Sunday, and some questions. These are on the spiritual matters. I think the details on the rockwork are clear enough. If you prefer to discuss any of this in person, let me know and I will be more than happy to make arrangements.

Can you please show me in Scripture where it says that we are supposed to keep the feasts, looking back after Christ as those did looking forward before Christ?

Can you tell me why we would keep the shadows once we have the real thing? Would that not be like keeping a picture of someone once that someone has arrived and come into our presence, occasionally showing him or her the picture and focusing on it? Or would it not be like valuing a contract for work to be done once the job is done, as though keeping the paperwork would ensure that the work remains done?

If, in saying that Jesus did not do away with the law, you include the ceremonial law, where then do you get the authority to omit so much of it, like the sacrifices, rituals, altars and Levitical priesthood? Did God lay out a new set of specific laws to replace the former? Where are they recorded? Or by whose valid authority were they changed, and how can we know they were right?

I would like to hear your answers, Kurt. If you believe you can teach me, then teach me; I am here. Again, give me the Word of God and not man’s reasonings, which are ever wrong.


Full version:

Hi Kurt,

I have had some thoughts on our discussion last Sunday, and some questions. These are on the spiritual matters. I think the details on the rockwork are clear enough. If you prefer to discuss them in person, let me know and I will be more than happy to make arrangements.

I had the impression you felt you could teach me and asked me to consider that this is so. I replied that I knew I could learn from you, meaning that we can all learn from every person, one way or another. However, I could have left you with the impression that spiritually, I acknowledged that we were in the same space. You know I don’t think we are and we aren’t. I want to make it clear because I don’t want to be disingenuous with you.

However, we have had many people come our way in a spiritual context, and while we have learned from them, they often go away learning very little from us, except that they learn the hard way, having rejected what we have had to offer, then suffering the consequences. We have seen it time and time again, with many cases being outright tragic.

If you do have the wherewith to teach us anything, we would like to know what it is.  We would also appreciate it if you were to answer the many questions we asked you in past correspondence. You say you destroyed it. On our part, we take these things seriously, under God. We have the letters on file for your reference, if you are willing.

You say, “Jesus kept the feasts and did not do away with the Law.” However, I pointed out to you that He kept the feasts as the Son of man. In the days of His flesh, He kept the Law as a Jew and had not yet fulfilled the ceremonial Law by laying down His life, rising from the dead and giving us His Spirit, thus fulfilling His mission and purpose that enables us to keep the moral Law. Once those things were done, once the feasts were fulfilled, nobody can say He continued the feasts or would require it of those who received His Spirit. The Scriptures indicate no such thing that I know of. Perhaps you can show me specifically otherwise. You need to, not only for my sake, but more so for yours, since you have committed yourself in this way for your salvation.

You seem to assume we believe that the Law was done away (a popular notion). We believe no such thing. The moral Law stands, and always will (Mat. 5:18). However, the ceremonial laws and ordinances were certainly fulfilled. As I said and as you know, the Temple, sacrifices, rituals, and the Levitical priesthood (those who were alone ordained to make sacrifices and conduct Temple services) all ceased within a generation of Christ’s death, resurrection and ascension. The vail of the Holy of Holies was miraculously torn from top to bottom, thus signifying the end of the shadow of things. Why would one continue in that which God had fulfilled, unless he did not have the substance?

Where in Scripture (if you deem the Scriptures to be authoritative under God, concerning the things of God) do you find any testimony that we keep the feasts, looking back to the time of Christ as did those before His time kept them, looking forward to His time? Can you give me specific, Biblical direction in that matter?

On the one hand, you say God did not do away with the law. You seem to include the ceremonial law (correct me if I am wrong). If you include the ceremonial law, such as the feasts, why do you criticize others for doing away with the law, or teaching that Christ did away with the law when you are not keeping the ceremonial law yourselves, as specified by the Word of God? Where do you find in Scripture that God changed the ceremonial law the way you have changed it? Where is the Levitical priesthood? Where are the sacrifices that were commanded?  Where are the Temple and the ordinances? All those have been done away, because fulfilled. Are you therefore not contradicting yourself?

On the other hand, the moral Law stands and will always stand, fulfilled by God Himself, through Jesus Christ, in those who have received His Spirit by a new birth. I am one of those who have experienced the reality.

What I see with you is that you have come only so far. You had a need in your life and began to pursue the spiritual dimension. You came into contact with people who have their take on what the Bible teaches but you have not come into a personal relationship with Jesus Christ. You have doctrine and beliefs, in His Name, but you do not know Him. Like with Stephen Harper, so with Jesus; you know some things of Him, but you do not know Him. Yet, knowing Him is what the feasts were all about.

Kurt, what I see is that your religion is an external one, your faith an intellectual one. While you have to start somewhere, I assure you that you cannot remain there. I am here to inform you, by the will of God, that He requires the inner reality.

By the will of God, you, in this life, can have a full assurance of salvation.

I expect that you will go through your exercise of “removing leaven,” of “making things right with thine neighbor,” preparing for the observance of the shadow coming up in Regina, but will eventually run out of steam in desire and commitment where we are concerned because it is your own steam and not His. You do not have the “power of Christ’s endless life” within you by virtue of the new birth. You even said that you could fail, expressing not humility so much as a lack of confidence in being able to live a righteous life indefinitely. That is because you have never been born again. I am here to tell you that you can indeed come to a place where you have full confidence to do the right thing, not that you would presumptuously trust in your own righteousness, but humbly, yet confidently in His. Paul, the apostle, whose words were not loose or merely theoretical, made this bold declaration:

“I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me” (Philippians 4:13 MKJV).

The very fact that you cannot be sure of doing the right thing is because your trust is not in Him but in yourself.

I seem to recollect that Herbert scoffed at the new birth (or Ted did), but I am here to tell you that it is real, necessary, the very will of God for those He calls to be His, and determined for this life, not just the next:

“But as many as received Him, He gave to them authority to become the children of God, to those who believe on His name, who were born, not of bloods, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but were born of God” (John 1:12-13 MKJV).

And: “Purifying your souls in the obedience of the truth through the Spirit to unfeigned love of the brothers, love one another fervently out of a pure heart, having been born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, through the living Word of God, and abiding forever” (1 Peter 1:22-23 MKJV).

I testified of the three feasts fulfilled in me (Passover, 1973; Pentecost, 1975; and Tabernacles, 2000); read Victor Hafichuk. It varies for every individual but the reality is His will, sooner or later.

You confessed that you gave me a low price with the hope and intention of winning us to your church. What if I “win” you to a new birth in Christ? What if I, by God’s grace, introduce you to the Savior that you might know Him in a new, living, meaningful way?  Would that not be a far greater reward for your price, infinitely, immeasurably, incomparably so?

Consider this, Kurt: While I can easily join your church (or almost all others) by simply abiding by your requirements, be it an acceptance of your doctrines, water baptism, whatever, it is not nearly as easy to join mine. Truth be told, it is impossible. If the Lord does not add you to His Body, no man can, neither the one seeking to join, nor any other. Truth be told again, no man truly seeks to be added to the Church, except the Father draws him.

Men can freely join men’s institutions called churches but only God can work that wonderful grace in a soul to bring him into a direct and personal fellowship with Him.

I would like to hear your answers, Kurt. If you believe you can teach me, then teach me; I am here. What are you waiting for? Prove me wrong, not by men’s doctrine or religion, not by opinion, or by theological theory unsubstantiated by God’s Word, but by God’s Word, not loosely or vaguely applied, but by “rightly dividing the Word of Truth,” by the sure authority of the Scriptures.

To this day you have been offended at me and what I have had to say, and have not responded to our questions and comments. I suspect you have paid next to nothing in considerate, caring, responsible attention to them, though we have spent much time and energy on your behalf. Don’t be offended. It only tells me that you do not have the answers. Just prove me wrong by the sure Word of Testimony. Show us our error. You will not offend us. Be honest, Kurt.



Kurt replied on April 7th:

Hello Victor,

Happy Sabbath, I have been looking into your questions and have found a few scriptures that I believe command us to keep the Feasts of the Lord.

Consider these:

(1Pe 2:21) For you were not called to this? For Christ also suffered on our behalf, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps,

Christ is our example therefore we should do as he did.

(Joh 7:10) But when His brothers had gone up, then He also went up to the feast, not openly, but as in secret.

Christ went to the Feast of Tabernacles.

(Joh 7:28) Then Jesus cried in the temple as He taught, saying, You both know Me, and you know from where I come. And I have not come of Myself, but He who sent Me is true, whom you do not know.

(Joh 7:28) Then Jesus cried in the temple as He taught, saying, You both know Me, and you know from where I come. And I have not come of Myself, but He who sent Me is true, whom you do not know.

Christ was there and taught at the Feast. Now, why was he there?

Leviticus 23 describes the Feasts of the Lord beginning with the Sabbath.

There are three scriptures I wish to draw your attention.

(Lev 23:21) And you shall proclaim on the same day that it may be a holy convocation to you. You shall do no work of labor. It shall be a statute forever in all your dwellings throughout your generations.

(Lev 23:31) You shall do no kind of work. It shall be a statute forever throughout your generations in all your dwellings.

A statute forever, as far as I can see this means into eternity.

From H5956; properly concealed, that is, the vanishing point; generally time out of mind (past or future), that is, (practically) eternity; frequentative adverbially (especially with prepositional prefix) always: – always (-s), ancient (time), any more, continuance, eternal, (for, [n-]) ever (-lasting, -more, of old), lasting, long (time), (of) old (time), perpetual, at any time, (beginning of the) world (+ without end). Compare H5331, H5703.

Now, regarding the sacrifices. The in the first covenant the blood of bulls and goats was used to make atonement for sin. Christ is a more perfect sacrifice than any animal could be as He was without spot.

(Heb 9:13) For if the blood of bulls and of goats and the ashes of a heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctifies to the purifying of the flesh,

(Heb 9:14) how much more shall the blood of Christ (who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself without spot to God) purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?

When Christ offered Himself up for our sins He made the sacrifices under the old covenant of no effect becuase He was more perfect. It is the sacrifical portion that He replaced.

This portion of your question I’m still working on. I do wonder this though why do you keep the sabbath and not the other Feasts of the Lord when they are listed together?

Anyway, I must go for now. I will see you tomorrow.


[Kurt also sent a booklet from the United Church of God, “The Law of God and New Covenant”]


Victor replied after a personal visit with Kurt the next day:

Hi Kurt,

Paul and I took a quick look at the “booklet” you suggested. We have to tell you that one, it is utterly lifeless, truly so; two, the things they say in it we have addressed in our letters to you – all of them. Now I know that you have yet to attentively read what we have sent you. We think you need to read what we have written. We have paid full attention to your words and dealt with them all. You need to extend the same courtesy to us, not give us more literature because you don’t have answers to our questions. We went to a lot of work dealing in these matters for your sake.

Next, concerning our visit Sunday, April 8/07, there is one statement you repeated that I wish to clarify. If I am wrong in my interpretation, correct me. You were saying that the low price of the rockwork can be justified, partly, if not substantially because of the inconvenience I suffer for the drawn out time of performance. Are you conditioning me for making it a longer drawn out affair? We are already into the third season, with not one wall completed. That was not what was agreed on. Though we both knew it would take time, seeing you would come only on days off, it seems there were several days where nothing happened and maybe should or could have. Here again though, I will not press you on it – Lord willing.

My next question is: “Are you trying to rationalize to yourself and justify the price by such factors like the job being drawn out, so as to not feel too disappointed or depressed or discouraged about the price you gave me?” If not, fine; if so, do you really think that is a solution to anything? If so, are you not fooling yourself? Why not simply live up to the commitment, get it done as soon as possible, and see where the Lord takes it? Dragging it out will only prolong what you might find to be unpleasant circumstances (which you ought not to see as such). I realize that you have been busy with other things, so that may be all there is to it, but I suspect there has been more.

Concerning our conversation on feasts, I want to tell you, not with offence, though you may be offended, that you are not keeping the feasts, while we are. You rightly said that the Feast of Tabernacles, as mentioned by Zechariah, includes all the feasts. That is what it is all about. They were intended to be fulfilled in us. That is why Jesus Christ came, died, rose again and gave us His Spirit. One can only know these things by His Spirit. We have received His Spirit and thus we know. You have not received His Spirit and therefore you cannot hear our words; you do not comprehend because you are yet in the flesh, in your carnal mind.

The Food from Heaven was finally made available to Israel and all of mankind 2000 years ago. The Substance was revealed when, by the predeterminate counsel and foreknowledge of God, the chaff was broken and opened up. By teaching that one must keep the feasts externally after that time, you are asking us to feed on that which the wind was to take away when the grain was winnowed.

Instead of the finished Rock, you are asking me to take pleasure in the scaffolding that held the Rock. Scaffolding has its time and place but when the work is done, scaffolding makes an unsightly scene and is no longer of use. It is to be removed. So it is with the feasts, Kurt; so with the feasts. While the scaffolding speaks of a fulfillment to come, one does not keep it in place to speak of that which came, or for a reminder that the fulfillment came. No reminder is needed because the Presence (Parousia) of the fulfillment is finally there. So yes, to keep scaffolding after the rockwork is done is not right, not good, not wise, and not fruitful. It is a marring of the beauty that has been manifest. Therefore, it is sin. It is an effrontery to both man and God.

Now God is not unrighteous that He should hold one accountable if he knows no better, but if he is informed or could know better and refuses, then there is a new dynamic at work:

“But all these things they will do to you for My Name’s sake, because they do not know Him Who sent Me. If I had not come and spoken to them, they would not have had sin; but now they have no excuse for their sin” (John 15:21-22 MKJV).

While God has been gracious to you, the laying on of hands and the water baptism you experienced did not bring you to receiving His Spirit. Of course, as you have made it known to us, you believe otherwise. How do we know these things? We know them because God reveals them to us.

Kurt, you said that perhaps you have things to learn and we have things to learn; perhaps you are wrong and we are right or vice versa; perhaps we have scales and you have scales. You said things along those lines. In other words, you were not sure if what we were saying was out of ignorance or true knowledge of God. I can tell you right now that we know whereof we speak, for Jesus said so:

“You worship what you do not know, we know what we worship, for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22 MKJV).

We know Him of Whom this is all about, Kurt. Jesus Christ has revealed Himself to us and has come and made His abode in us, as He promised He would:

“He who has My commandments and keeps them, he it is who loves Me. And he who loves Me shall be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will reveal Myself to him” (John 14:21 MKJV).

By His grace, we have kept His commandments, not as you suppose, by our righteousness, but by His, and He has revealed Himself to us. We walk with Him on His behalf before the whole earth, sent by Him to those He chooses.

He has spoken to you by us. I said there was value in the feasts in that one can learn to do right because they are a demonstration of righteousness. However, they were only meant for an age; now they are no longer.

You need to come away from a form of worship to the One of Whom worship is all about.

You speak of feasts, we speak of Jesus;

you speak of religion, we speak of reality;

you speak of a church on earth, we speak of the Heavenly Jerusalem;

you speak doctrine, we bear witness to the Truth;

you speak of an intellectual understanding, we of a spiritual;

you speak of the earthly kind of works, we speak of a Heavenly;

you speak from earth, we speak from Heaven;

you speak of faith out of works, we speak of works out of faith;

you speak by yourself, we speak by Him, the Lord of Heaven and earth;

you speak of Him, we speak in and by Him;

you speak by the appointment of men, we speak by His appointment;

you would have us enter into the works of men, we would have you enter into the work of God.

Kurt, you have heard the Truth, having been granted the privilege to do so. God has done it. You have received far more than you bargained for in this encounter. What will you do with it? If you believe, it will go well for you; if not, it will not go well for you. We do not condemn you. As Jesus said:

“For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but so that the world might be saved through Him. He who believes on Him is not condemned, but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only-begotten Son of God. And this is the condemnation, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than the Light, because their deeds were evil. For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light, lest his deeds should be exposed. But he who practices truth comes to the Light so that his works may be revealed, that they exist, having been worked in God” (John 3:17-21 MKJV).

We have not just religion but Life itself, from Life Himself. That is why we have all that we have, and it is all good. We are here to pass it on to all those who believe, that they too may prosper in body, soul and spirit.

You wait for His coming because He has not yet made Himself known to you. We walk in His Coming. He is here, now. You speak of Sabbaths. We are the Sabbath. That is what the Hebrews writer talks about. I expect that you and your friends will scoff at these things, as Paul declares:

“But the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. But he who is spiritual judges all things, yet he himself is judged by no one. For who has known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct Him? But we have the mind of Christ” (1 Corinthians 2:14-16 MKJV).


Related posts:

wHaT tHe LoRd HaS dOnE wItH mE; Part IX, Page 11
Page 11 PART NINE - Signs of New Times (cont.) Particle - A Strange ReactionA regular and pleased customer, Kathy Kvile, came to our farm. She was extremely curious about what we were all about, religiously and spiritually. She asked many questions, differing with us on many matters, such as creation, evolution, and homosexuality. She disagreed about not belonging to a formal church and about hearing the voice of God on many matters. The Bensons were present; we talked until 11:30 at night. We were patient and friendly with her, though frank and unapologetic. Kathy turned from incredulous to scornful. We never heard from Kathy again. However, I did write her parents, Harvey and Janet, who were churchgoers, her mother professing faith. I described the incident to them, but never heard from them, either. Particle - Paul at It Again Sara arrived in Helena late in the afternoon of the 30th of July. On August 9th, Paul sent me a bomb by email. He had said nothing to me at the Hartman wedding twelve days earlier, but Paul was planning or hoping to marry Sara (unbeknownst to her) even before we saw him at Kerri's wedding on the 29th. Here is that email: Good Day Victor! I don't know of a gentle way to introduce what I want to tell you in this letter. So I will only begin by saying this is a heavy duty thing I want to tell you about. It is time. I have loved Sara for some time. It started, I think, after the first time I spoke with her on the phone. It was...
Letter to Florence Pastoor
  well thanks for the harvest haven herald - it was great...  except, I confess... I was confused and alarmed by the comment about 'gay marriages' being legalized - it was sort of in a section that lists the ills of the world and surely to god you are not proposing that some of god's children (gay though they may be) deserve less than the rest of us in terms of dignity and the right to be true to their own nature... anyways - if you are of the opinion that humans of the same sex can't be in loving relationships like the rest of us, then I suggest you ask god for help in arriving at the same kind of enlightened thinking you possess around the production of food...    sincerely,   Florence     Greetings in the Lord Jesus Christ, Florence!   I am glad you appreciated this issue of the HHH, and thank you for the feedback. Let us have a frank, open discussion of this matter. I have questions and answers. I hope you will be able to respond rationally and objectively. I am going to tell you up front that you're wrong in your thinking, that you have neither authority nor credible source for believing what you do, and I will tell you why you don't. I will also tell you by what authority we believe what we do and why our understanding is therefore true and justified.   I wonder why you were confused about the portion on homosexual marriages. There are those who approve, and those who do not. We do not. Why the confusion? You ...
wHaT tHe LoRd HaS dOnE wItH mE; Part VIII, Page 1
Introduction                              Table of Contents PDF Version PART EIGHT– Day 888 to Victory The Third Dimension (cont.) (More of) The Feast of PENTECOST Particle - Carnal and Spiritual Love Sean and my wife, Marilyn, talked of how much and in what way they loved each other, a way, Marilyn declared, I'd never known. Yet I didn't see their love for each other or for anyone else. I have long preached that the love the world talks about, the love of romance, sentiment, and feeling, is not the true or highest love to which God calls us and in which we must all walk at the cost of any other kind, such as love of family and friendship. To fall short of the highest love is to fall short of God, His glory, and His Kingdom. The Greeks had specific words for these two loves, one being “phileo,” a love those in the world are capable of having for one another, it being predominantly a love of emotion and feelings. The other is “agape,” the spiritual love no person possesses without the grace of God. This love is one of unselfish will for another. It is not one of feelings or sentiment, but one of determination, a matter of will. The agape love is not reactive only, but proactive. Satan and his children have phileo (they can do no better), but God and His children deal in the realm of agape. I noted how Jesus was somehow different after the resurrection toward His disciples than before. After the resurrection, He seemed more distant or almost detached. Yet His Spirit, ...
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Provide your email if you would like to receive periodic correspondence from us.

You can leave a comment herex