Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Love, Hate; And Where Is “John Paul II”?

We have received several letters accusing us of hate and bitterness. Before God and man, I can honestly and exuberantly declare that we hate no man or woman or any being. We do not take pride in that fact, because we know that in us is the capability of hate and every evil thing possible. I am, however, very thankful that we can declare innocence of hatred to any person, knowing that Jesus Christ has made this a reality for us by the crucifixion, burial and resurrection to life. Moreover, we love all mankind, as unlovable as mankind can be.

The love of God dictates that people are confronted with their sins and error.

Yes, we do condemn all falsity. We do speak against the hypocrisy, not only in religion but in all of life. We do sharply rebuke the perpetrators of religious evil most of all, because they come and teach lies in the Name of God. They presume to serve Him, when in truth, they serve themselves and deceive others, serving to turn them away from God. Of such as these, Jesus had the harshest of words:

“But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut up the kingdom of Heaven against men. For you neither go in, nor do you allow those entering to go in” (Matthew 23:13 MKJV).

And:

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which indeed appear beautiful outside, but inside they are full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so you also appear righteous to men outwardly, but inside you are full of hypocrisy and iniquity” (Matthew 23:27-28 MKJV).

Did Jesus hate? You can count on it. He hated legalism. He hated hypocrisy. He hated vain worship. He hated form without substance. He hated pride. He hated all those things with which religious, nominal Christendom teems, and which it practices and preaches in all its impudence and presumption. He hates it all.

They accuse us of “judging.” Yes, we are judging, without apology, and it is righteous judgment that we judge. Those guilty, if unrepentant, hate us for it. We can judge righteous judgment because we have removed the beams from our eyes, by the grace of God. People do not savor being told that they are sinners, or that they are hypocrites, or that their faith is false or nonexistent. People do not like being told that they are wrong. They would rather have us focus on the “love of God.” Well, we do focus on the love of God and the love of God dictates that people know themselves for the culprits they truly are, as declared in Scripture. The love of God dictates that people are confronted with their sins and error, so that knowing so, they will reconsider, repent, and be saved. Otherwise, they will be destroyed in their sins and ignorance of those sins. Would you rather we did not warn you of the folly of your ways, which you think are good and true, and from the destruction to come? Are you depending on a counterfeit gospel to save you? Are you looking forward to a rapture? Forget it. It won’t happen, not the way you think. We come with pins of truth that prick the gassy balloons of false doctrine, which many expect to lift them up to Heaven. For that, we are hated.

By the many cults of this world, we are condemned as a cult. How convenient it is to deflect the onus from the guilty and to shoot the messengers who truly speak in the love of God, by God! The false are loved and the true are hated. The world does indeed lie in wickedness, even as John declares (1 John 5:19).

He would experience the very opposite of what he had in this world.

Here is more news for those who have the ears to hear. I will tell you of a vision I had concerning one who has been the most widely loved and revered person in all the earth in this present day, and who has just left it. I will tell you that which the Lord showed me of the one that most people deem to be the holiest of men in this century. He acted it. But what was in his heart, truly? It is a vision that I had from God of Karol Wojtyla, who was known as Pope John Paul II. It is quite contrary to the words spoken of him by his successor, “Benedict XVI,” who said: “We can be sure that our beloved Pope is standing today at the window of the Father’s house, that he sees us and blesses us.

Just after the pope died, around April 2 or 3, 2005, I wondered what had become of him in the next world. I then saw him, about twelve feet ahead on a road, turned away about 130 degrees from me, starting to head into desolate places in lower regions, which seemed to be slums. He was appointed thus to suffer. He would experience the very opposite of what he had in this world. For fame, he would have obscurity and ignominy; for glory, shame and humiliation; for riches, abject poverty; for respect, reproach; for praise, contempt; for sumptuous dining, famine; for authority, begging; for security, danger and doubt; for fine clothing, rags; for joy, sorrow; for social activity, loneliness. All those things he had and which he denied others while pretending to provide, and champion, for them, he has lost, and has received the very opposite as his just compensation.

I saw no humility in Karol Wojtyla. He still postured as though very important, and it almost seemed as though he was expecting things to change quickly, as though someone was playing a temporary game with him, or as though what he was seeing was an illusion. He did not seem to believe it, though the reality was slowly dawning on him. The truth is that he had been living in illusion in this world, and was now committed to an unexpected and undesirable reality. He would experience that which was the lot of the least of his former subjects, multiplied. “The first shall be last, and the last first.” “He that humbles himself shall be exalted, and he that exalts himself shall be humbled.

Victor Hafichuk

For more about the falsehoods of the Catholic Church:

Catholicism

In this world, looming behind any consideration of what it means to be a Christian is the Catholic Church, with her audacious claim to being the sole authority representing Christ on earth, with all power of God vested in her. Does this claim hold up to the Light of Day? Here, in simple terms, you have the opportunity to have a look and see for yourself.

 

Related posts:

Michael Rood's Gnostic Leaven

From: Dana To: The Path of Truth Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 12:54 AM Subject: Nice siteBless you for your efforts! Is this site in a Berean or Messianic type of area? There's much to read, so if you could give me a general idea as to your area of belief it'd be helpful until I've the time to read more. There was a mention of a chat fellowship, which I've done before on Michael Rood's site. The fellowship chat felt shallow & meaningless...nobody really cared about each other. Just curious about if you've any insight to A Rood Awakenings teachings. Are they gnostic? If you have any suggestions to a legitimate fellowship of sabbath keepers in the Fort Mill SC area, please indicate.Thank you again & keep fighting!DanaFrom: Paul Cohen To: Dana Cc: Victor Hafichuk, Sara Schmidt Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 10:20 AM Subject: Re: Nice siteHi Dana; welcome to The Path of Truth, the Lord Jesus Christ’s site. It’s all about and from Him – not Berean or Messianic, but Who and What He is in His people – the living Body of believers. The following link will give you an overall view of what the Lord has taught us of His ways and doctrines: Statement of Doctrine. The chat fellowship we have is composed of the believers we know and are in touch with, none of whom live in South Carolina. We’re dispersed throughout the world, a few here and there, but not many presently in one place. You’re welcome to join us any Sabbath, at 12 noon MST – t...

Is RC Sproul a false teacher?

From: Marie Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2017 4:34 PM To: ask@thepathoftruth.com Subject: R.C. SproulHi!I have followed R.C. for more than a decade. What’s the word on him (not to be confused with his son, R.C. Jr). I have been burned more than once - MacArthur and Zacharias are 2 examples. I have grown cold on R.C. and I wonder if it’s me or him.Regards,MarieFrom: Paul Cohen Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2017 7:25 AM To: Marie Cc: Victor Hafichuk Subject: Re: R.C. SproulHi Marie,There’s essentially no difference between Sproul, MacArthur, and Zacharias. All three say some true things, but they’re also prime promoters of falsehood as part of the beastly system of religion the Word of God calls “Babylon,” the “paths of the destroyer.”“Concerning the works of men, by the Words of Your lips, I am kept from the paths of the destroyer” (Psalms 17:4 MKJV).Sproul promotes Calvin and his infernal doctrine, for example. Read about the antidote of Truth here:True Hope for Reform Church Members and All Calvin Doctrine VictimsAnd who is Calvin, anyway? The Fruit of Cain Multiplied: The Murderer John CalvinMaybe it’s your time, Marie, to come to the Lord “outside the camp.” If so, heed His call – it’s for your life.The Case for Coming OutPaul and Victor

A Carnal Mind Can’t See God’s Mind and Restitution

From: Gerhard To: The Path of Truth Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 7:30 PM Subject: Derek Prince False teacherDear Sir, I have noted your refutation of Derek Prince in terms of some of his teachings. From your website:"Let it be known, however, that almost all who call themselves “Universalists” are in great error, as we explain in The Deadly Error of the Universalists. Whereas some of Mr. Prince’s words may apply to these erring Universalists (though his doctrine is error), we are not among those in line of his unrighteous fire."I am interested in the source of your concerns? Please can you direct me to the specific teaching - books, YouTube or otherwise - where I can find the teaching according to which you consider him a Universalist?Should the above not clarify the question, can you refer me to what you will consider his most erroneous teachings? Thanks very much. Best regards, Gerhard From: Paul Cohen To: Gerhard Cc: Victor Hafichuk Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 8:50 AM Subject: Re: Derek Prince False teacherHi Gerhard,You have misunderstood what we’re saying about Derek Prince. We aren’t calling him a Universalist. Here is the quote in context, with my added emphasis in red to help clarify what we’re saying: “God having given us grace to do so, we address the late Mr. Derek Prince’s refutation of the truth of the reconciliation of all things, which truth the Scriptures do most certainly declare. We have written a fe...
Subscribe
Notify of
5 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Provide your email if you would like to receive periodic correspondence from us.



5
0
You can leave a comment herex
()
x