Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Government Finding God’s Law Despicable

From: Victor Hafichuk
To: Councilman Jeff Carlson
Sent: Sunday May 18, 2014, at 10:06 PM,
Subject: A Personal Note

Hi Jeff,
Let me write you a unique, honest, but respectful letter of the kind you may possibly have never received before.
I believe by the many reports I’ve received that you are a homosexual. I’ll tell you that as a believer on the Lord Jesus Christ, I disagree with such a lifestyle. But then, I also disagree with adultery, fornication, hatred of others, theft, deception for evil’s sake and so on. Where you depart from the public stance on these vices is that you declare the legal and social right to what the Bible calls sin. At least you’re honest about it.
That said, if you can believe it, I don’t condemn you for being homosexual. I declare to you that God will one day bring you to His Light as well. He will cleanse and make you free of your ways contrary to Him. He loves you, Jeff, way beyond any kind of love you’ve sought or even heard of.
I wanted to be open with you about these things. But that’s not my primary cause for writing. When we met at the Page Break, you objected with a “Come on!” to our distributing “Poison in our Water” signs, judging we were over the top. 
Jeff, I solemnly tell you that if you were to responsibly investigate the truth of the issue of fluoridation, you would, with integrity and alacrity, swiftly change your tune. If you knew what we know after due investigation and due diligence, you could not argue.
More importantly, the issue isn’t merely one of science, but of ethics. The Precautionary Principle demands we take fluoride out of the water. The fact that nobody has the right to prescribe medication (fluoride is touted as a medication to prevent cavities)…without individual diagnosis, without personalized dosage, and without informed consent. How insane is that, Jeff? 
Think man! Those sound elements of social justice are more than sufficient to require Council to do the right thing and stop fluoridation.
Therefore, we look for no plebiscite, only a decision by City Council to end fluoridation of our water. The majority doesn’t have the right to impose its’ rights on so much as one person when it comes to freedom of choice in health treatment. AHS violates its own principles in all contradiction and hypocrisy. 
Jeff, we ask you to give yourself to actively, valiantly oppose artificial water fluoridation. You’ll be saving lives, no less. 
Want sure proof of our declarations and the bait-and-switch tactics of the pro-fluoride camp and the sure evidence of serious harm? Study/review our AHS Rebuttal document  we’ve left with you in hardcopy at City Hall. You’ll find all the answers and facts needed to understand and fight fluoridation. 
I seriously look forward to talking further with you. 
From: Jeff Carlson
To: Victor Hafichuk
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: Personal Note

Well, Victor, you are correct.. I have never received a letter like this before. Please do not discuss my personal life ever again.

Jeff Carlson 
Lethbridge City Council

From: Councilwoman Liz Iwaskiw
To: Victor Hafichuk
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 1:34 PM
Subject: No meeting

I don’t think there is any reason for us to meet at the moment Victor because the statement I made to the London Road Neighbourhood Association was accurate. If and when the fluoride issue comes before council I will revisit the information available at that time and see no reason for discussion until then. And now that I have seen your truly despicable email to my friend Jeff Carlson I cannot fathom a circumstance where I would ever want to meet with you on any topic.

From: Victor Hafichuk
To: Liz and Jeff
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2014 5:29 PM
Subject: Re: No Meeting

Liz, I would be very interested in the “further studies and new anecdotal evidence” on artificial water fluoridation you mention. We’re aware of the false alarm suggesting an increase of children’s cavities in Calgary since they ended fluoridation in 2011. Dr. Luke Shwart, Dental Public Health Officer for Alberta Health Services, declared it would take at least 5 years to determine results. So how can there be any conclusive evidence so soon? 

We’re also aware of several dentists and investigating doctors in Calgary who unequivocally deny there’s been any increase in cavities. But we’re entirely unaware of any studies supportive of fluoridation. To the contrary, studies specifically designed to test cavity rates after stopping fluoridation have been done and none of these dozen or so studies show an increase in cavities. 

So yes, please do give me those references; it would be much appreciated and we will most diligently investigate them.  

You condemn me and my letter to Jeff. Can you tell me just how it was despicable?

Was it because I spoke what was true? Do you find truth despicable?

Was it because I spoke only the truth (so far as I know), with no flattery or whitewashing? Do you find truth “truly” despicable?

Was it because I was honest with Jeff? Do you find honesty despicable? 

Was it because I was sincere in my expression, without condemning Jeff? Do you find sincerity despicable?

Was it because, in spite of Jeff’s and my disagreement on a lifestyle choice obviously important to each of us, that I’ve chosen to be his friend, and willingly extended the olive branch? Is that despicable to you?

Do you find it despicable that I should be able to express what I believe, just as you allow Jeff to express what he believes? 

Do you find it despicable that I’m saying things you don’t agree with, while you now freely choose to be contemptuous of me? 

Or is it because you despise God and His immutable, eternal Law, as put forth in the Holy Scriptures? Is that not what you find “truly despicable”?

If that’s so, then not only are you and I on opposite sides of the coin – we deal in a different currency all together. And in such a case, I believe you when you say you can’t fathom wanting to meet me again on any topic. So be it; it’s your decision, at least for now.

And Jeff,

As you’re likely aware, the letter I sent to you wasn’t sent to Liz Iwaskiw or any other councillor. It was, as titled, a “Personal Note.” So with all the recent letters I sent to individual councillors. 

You chose to fault me with your companions; I didn’t choose to do so with you. 

Isn’t it ironic that you require of me that I do not discuss your personal life “ever again,” but you reserve the right to talk to others against me about what I said personally to you, as a friend? Do you reserve the right to share my personal mail with others while denying me the right to speak honestly with you? 

Seeing you’ve shared our correspondence with Liz, I write the two of you this time. Truth has visited both of you in unequivocal, decisive speech this day. It won’t be the same for either of you any longer. That’s the way Truth works.

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Lord of all,

Victor Hafichuk  

Related posts:

Questions on the Trinity Answered

From: Jock To: The Path of Truth Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:31 PM Subject: Trinity? So I started reading about Todd White, which lead me to another false teacher you mentioned, then to the Trinity. I noticed you take a hard line against it. Implying that it's a false teaching and saying that the scriptures used to validate it aren't found until later on, which I'm sure you're talking about 1 John 5:7 where the Bible says, "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one" which came about after the "Council of Nicaea" in 325AD so I wanted to ask a few questions regarding some scriptures. Matthew 3:17 "And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased" Matthew 17:5 " While he yet spake, behold, a bright cloud overshadowed them: and behold a voice out of the cloud, which said, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him. Like verses in Mark, Luke etc. Additionally, Acts 7:55-56; Romans 8:34; Ephesians 1:20; Colossians 3:1; Hebrews 1:3, 8:8, 10:12,12:2; 1 Peter 3:22, Revelations 3: 21; Matthew 22:44; Acts 2:33 Which all talk about Jesus sitting at the right hand of God. How's that possible unless they're different entities within One, such as the Trinity suggest? Furthermore, in 1 John 2:1 "My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the ri...

Denouncing Sin with "Mean" Words Is Holy

Mike As a father of young children, my protective and aggressive instincts would be aroused if I were to catch a "transgender" individual within the same change room as any one of my children. This is madness!!! Sign here to oppose Canada’s sweeping new transgender legislation The debate about “transgender” rights is raging across the globe, and the latest victim of the tolerance parade is set to be Canada. Dangerous legislation,… Dave Is a "transgender" person different than a transgender person? If so, how does one determine the difference? Mike I guess in my passion I put quotes around it since I don't validate the transgender folk as a valid identity. There are very rare instances where someone is born with both genitalia. Those folk I can understand a bit better. Those choosing, for whatever reason, to deny their physiology I have less understanding for. I am kicking against governments forcing this into law, all the while quashing the rights of helpless children. It would feel like a violation for me to enter a women's washroom to protect my children. It's just messed up and pisses me off. Arnold I'd say your kids are no safer in the current situation. Never send them into any public facility on their own. Mike I'd say they ARE safer right now. Right now there is a barrier to having a male in a women's washroom. Right?! Martin Yes, Mike, agreed! Enid When our boys were young we practiced "safety kids" .... Someone always accompanied them t...

How the Religious Reject Jesus

From: Genevieve To: The Path of Truth Sent: Sunday, April 17, 2016 5:38 AM  Read your comments regarding John Ramirez. I had watch John on Sid Roth's Supernatural program. I purchased his book and I'm please with it. You comments has an implication of jealousy. Thats an hindering spirit. Have you appeared on any program that I and/or other believers in Jesus Christ can watch or view. Jealousy is very very bad. I am not going to cite an hundred scriptures just to say jealousy us bad and its a hindering spirit. I may be wrong, however, your comments indicate otherwise. God Bless You.  From: Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk To: Genevieve Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 6:58 AM Subject: Pleased with the False/Displeased by the True Genevieve, you not only may be wrong, you are wrong. You suspect we’re jealous, but that’s only a suspicion from your imagination, not reality.  We don’t need to appear on a TV program for us to reach you with the truth in Jesus Christ. That’s already happened here on our site, don’t you think? And are you rejecting Him?  “I have come in My Father's Name, and you do not receive Me. If another shall come in his own name, him you will receive. How can you believe, you who receive honor from one another and do not seek the honor that comes from God only?” (John 5:43-44 MKJV) Paul and Victor
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Provide your email if you would like to receive periodic correspondence from us.

You can leave a comment herex