Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Being Correct in All Teachings

From: Chris
To: The Path of Truth
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 6:16 PM
Subject: Question

I just stumbled onto your site this evening while searching Clayton Jennings. I read the article between yourselves, Allison and Clayton. Very discouraging. 

I was not impressed with Clayton’s replies, but he is right, you know nothing about him, except reading his website. 

I then went to the ‘false teachers’ page and was very surprised at the list of names there. I trust that by you openly judging all those people, you have done more research than you did with Mr. Jennings. 

I am not endorsing Clayton Jennings, but if he is drawing people to Christ, then what is wrong with that?  I was taught, by Greg Laurie, who didn’t make your list, that we should not put our trust in any man, only The Lord. Man will let you down, every time. 

It is the responsibility of the seekers of Christ to determine what is correct and what is not and get that knowledge from Him. The way they are lead to Him does not matter. 

Another thing that has stuck with me, a dear friend of mine told me, we take in the information we receive from man, like eating a peach. You spit out the pit, right?  Same rule applies….no man can be 100% correct in all of his teachings, except one!!!



From: Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk
To: Chris
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Question

“Do not judge according to sight, but judge righteous judgment” (John 7:24 MKJV).

Chris, does it not occur to you that while you find fault with us for addressing error and correcting others, you are doing that very thing with us?

What gives you the authority to correct us (or anyone else for that matter) when it comes to the things of the Kingdom of God? Are you an apostle, pastor, prophet, or teacher sent by the Lord Jesus Christ or are you simply giving us your opinion, your doctrinal perspective based on your intellectual understanding of the Scriptures and things in general? 

Are you aware that there are many Jesuses preached and represented in the Name of the One and Only True Jesus Christ, some so convincing and close to the true that even the elect (chosen and learned) of God stand to be deceived? 

What makes you so sure you can judge whether Clayton Jennings or we are right or wrong? How do you know we haven’t been called and commissioned by the Lord to judge men by righteous judgment (His revelation and understanding) as He has commanded, and not by judgment after the appearance as you may be doing – and are? You accuse us of having little or no substance in our judgment of Jennings. Do you really know?

You write, “Another thing that has stuck with me, a dear friend of mine told me, we take in the information we receive from man, like eating a peach. You spit out the pit, right?” 

It’s interesting the way you put it. The problem is people think they’re eating peaches when eating something else, so it really doesn’t matter if they eat the pit or not, does it? As well, many can’t tell the difference between what should be swallowed and what should be rejected. Consider the millions of lost souls believing lies in nominal Christendom, orthodox or otherwise (Diabolical Doctrines and The True Marks of a Cult). What does that tell you? 

And don’t you know that all it takes is a tiny portion of poison hidden in a sumptuous meal to destroy the eater? Or just a little yeast ruins everything? “Your boasting is not good. Don’t you know that a little yeast leavens the whole lump?” (1 Corinthians 5:6 WEB)

So just how wise is your dear friend’s saying, after all? 

You make the all too common claim, “No man can be 100% correct in all of his teachings, except one!!!

Is that so? Chris, that is a big, popular lie straight from the pits of hell, commonly believed by unbelievers and deceived unbelieving believers. What you’re doing by this lie is calling Jesus Christ a liar and selling Him short on His power to bring men to perfection and lead them into all truth, in this present age, here on earth – when and where they need it. He promised the Spirit of Truth would lead us into all truth (John 16:13). Our beloved brother John said the Lord’s anointing causes us to “know all things” (1 John 2:20, 27). He also said: 

“I have not written to you because you don’t know the truth, but because you know it, and because no lie is of the truth” (1 John 2:21 WEB).

Chris, it’s a good thing to speak and learn something as a result, but is it good to speak as you do before you know what you’re talking about as though you “know all things”?

“If one answers a matter before he hears, it is folly and shame to him” (Proverbs 18:13 MKJV).

Clayton Jennings isn’t drawing men to Christ – he is drawing men to himself in the Name of Christ. Also read The Cross – Only the Death Sentence Will Avail. 

Victor and Paul

Related posts:

The Trinity and Hell
Subject: Trinity And Hell From: Cathy Allen To: ThePathOfTruth Date: 10/11/2015 3:21 AM Hi, I am trying to fathom, what the problem is with the Godhead being referred to as the trinity or Triune God. I am a triune creature, as far as I can understand. I have a body a mind and a spirit, therefore I am 3 (parts) not persons, but still one and the same person. Remove my body and I still have a mind and spirit, and still am me. I believe an egg to be three in one, as in, it has a shell,a yolk and the white. If I remove the white, it is still an egg. I don't call an egg, eggs, because of an egg having three components to it. (Not counting the oxygen and microbes, microscopic organisms and bacteria etc, which are also present, but hidden from our eyes. However, an egg still has to include the three parts which are in unity with each other. If I were to send the yolk of an egg to America, the white and the shell would still be referred to as the egg, here in Australia, not as one of the eggs. The egg which is temporarily or permanently, without the yolk, is three parts in one, but all essential to and belonging to the other,to be called one egg. It is another situation with a fertilized egg,as there is a massive change as a chick develops, yet still it is considered to be AN egg, but all the parts are acknowledged and affirmed. They are one and the same egg, able to be separated if we so desire, or left alone, it still remains as the egg. I do...
The Answer to Social Anxiety and Being Scatterbrained
From: Esdras To: The Path of Truth Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 8:00 AM Subject: Re: bible translation in your article The asininity of the trinity when explain in the verse genesis 1:26-27 so are the angels made in gods image  From: Paul Cohen To: Esdras Cc: Victor Hafichuk Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 6:38 AM Subject: Re: bible translation Hi Esdras,  You should quote the material you’re asking about. Do you think we have a website of thousands of pages memorized, or that the particular words and context they’re used in aren’t important? On either count you’d be wrong.  Here’s the portion:  In order to promote the doctrine of the trinity, the writers of GotQuestions read into what the Scriptures say according to their natural minds and indoctrination of men. Let’s look at some common verses used to prop up the egregious pagan doctrine of trinitarianism: Genesis 1:26-27 JPS (26) And God said: “Let Us make man in Our image, after Our likeness; and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps upon the earth.” (27) And God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them. Why “Us” and “Our” in verse 26, since God is singular in verse 27, it saying “He,” not “They”? To begin, God was not alone: Job 38:4-7 MKJV (4) Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth? Te...
One Drunk on False Love Stumbles Over the Truth
From: Peggy To: The Path of Truth Sent: Monday, April 25, 2016 1:23 PM Subject: Chan I read what you wrote about Chan… I usually check your site and agree with most of your sayings but I disagree completely with your writings on Chan.  According to your writing you would even say Paul was a false teacher!!!  Paul states in Phillipians 4:9 for them to follow HIS example what he does they should do… also just do a check how many times Paul uses the word I … In his writing referring to himself.  Chan is preaching a Holiness movement that maybe you are afraid to hear… but it is sound and biblical and YES there is a HELL… if you don’t believe it than you obviously do not believe Jesus because He spoke of Hell far more than HE spoke of Heaven….. I believe your site will lead many astray and I sincerely pray for y our team. In Gods Love Peggy From: Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk To: Peggy Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 7:27 AM Subject: Re: Chan Peggy, you’ve misinterpreted what you’ve red on our site and haven’t given us substance that proves we err about Chan or anything else.  For example, we most certainly know and say that Hell exists, having been liberated from it by the Lord Jesus Christ. Read The State and Fate of Hell. We know and have shown, for those with eyes to see, that those who follow Chan’s example are in Hell, while those who follow the apostle Paul’s example are in Heaven, the Kingdom of God.  You’re not coming to us in God’s love, ...
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Provide your email if you would like to receive periodic correspondence from us.

You can leave a comment herex