Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Diabolical Doctrine: The Bible Is the Ultimate Authority

EnglishSpanish

It has been the inclination of man, even before the Fall, to choose worship of anything other than Jesus Christ, the Only One worthy. Why else would Adam and Eve have chosen to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil? Besides every sort of creature or cause, they will worship a man of God, as did the Pharisees Moses; they will worship worshipping, as do all religious people; they will worship doctrine, even true doctrine; and they will worship the Holy Scriptures, which testify of Jesus Christ. As they do all these things, they cast Him aside as less worthy.

Read False Christianity Unmasked, Bible Worship Used by Men to Cover Evil, and In Defense of Extra-Biblical Inspiration of God.

Consider the alternative to worshipping the Bible: If in spirit and in truth, you worship the Author of the Bible, you’ll be delivered from idolatry and you will understand as never before the Scriptures you’ve worshipped, to the saving of your soul.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related posts:

Diabolical Doctrine: Man Has Free Will

God is Lord of all. He alone is the Master of all destinies; otherwise He is Lord of nothing. Either one has free will, or one does not. Liberty must be total, or it isn’t true liberty - it’s only frustrating torment.

Diabolical Doctrine: Deathbed Conversions to Christ

Considering the manner of life of the saints in the Scriptures, you’ll not find one instance where they sought to convert a person to faith at time of death. That’s because nothing whatsoever is commanded or taught by God that would induce one to coerce or cajole last-minute professions of faith from anybody. Such wouldn’t be true faith. Men of faith die as men of faith and the wicked die in their sins.

The Abomination of Desolation for Satan's Darkened Followers

From: Janet To: The Path of Truth Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:59 AM Subject: ConfusedI just got through watching an episode of "It's Supernatural" with Sid Roth.  Obviously, you don't like him very much.  I decided to read your article which claimed to "expose" him, but nowhere in this article could I find anything specific that explained how he turned to the occult, and could not be believed/trusted.  I'm not objecting to your claims; I'm just saying that you don't seem to provide any proof for them.So my question is simply, what things has Mr. Roth done/not done that you find objectionable?  Bear in mind that I'm really not familiar with the guy at all and I'm not trying to defend him because I've only watched one of his shows, and it was the first time I had even heard of him.  I'm just wondering why you find him to be a false prophet, or whatever.  I feel that such accusations should not be made lightly, because they may be read and believed by many people without any substantiation.Again, I would be interested in reading your explanation for your objection to Mr. Roth.  For all I know, I may agree with you.Thanks.  I do not use this Gmail address for mail; if you do care to write, I can be reached at .From: Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk To: Janet Sent: Friday, July 08, 2016 6:35 AM Subject: Re: ConfusedYou most certainly are confused, Jan, but it’s not because we haven’t stated things plainly. For example, Mr. Roth himself explains abou...
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Provide your email if you would like to receive periodic correspondence from us.



0
You can leave a comment herex
()
x