Our website is best viewed using any internet
browser besides Mozilla Firefox versions 6.0 and later (some
users don't have problems). We recommend Google
Chrome, Internet Explorer, and earlier versions of Firefox
(go to "Help
- About Firefox" to know your version).
Mark Benson's Letter to Minister Dombrowsky
Mark Benson, manager of Harvest
Haven Health & Market Farm, wrote
the following letter to the Ontario Minister of Agriculture, Food
and Rural Affairs, Leona Dombrowsky:
Minister Dombrowsky,
I ask you to support the appeal of Matthew Dick to your Ministry
against the entirely unjust tribunal hearing that stripped him
of the right to raise turkeys with access to the outdoors. As a
graduate from Tokyo University of Agriculture Master's Program
in Bioindustry, and as an organic poultry farmer, I find the reasoning
behind this ruling to be absurdly lacking in scientific evidence.
There is NO evidence that has ever shown healthy
poultry, raised
with access to the outdoors, to be susceptible to avian
influenza spread from the wild bird population. The only poultry
population
at high risk of susceptibility to Avian Influenza is that of
unhealthy birds contained in outrageously dense populations, with
limited air flow and high humidity, sitting constantly in
layers of their own feces, such as found in commercial poultry
barns; perfect conditions for the incubation and spread of disease.
In these conditions, disease is barely held in check by prophylactic
antibiotic dosing, which is responsible for heightened antibiotic
resistance in human pathogens.
Turkeys and chickens are not so different from humans. We do not
thrive when deprived of sunshine, fresh air, good food, and exercise,
never mind sitting in our own feces crowded shoulder to shoulder
in a high humidity room eating rendered animal guts. Birds given
high quality food and a healthy environment have better immune
systems. It is that simple.
If confinement was the answer, how did the avian influenza
outbreaks occur in regular poultry operations? Obviously, viruses
are able to enter the barn through the air-intake system, doors,
or with workers. The logical conclusion is not to try
to keep the virus out of the barn, but rather lower susceptibility
of the birds and eliminate the unhealthy conditions conducive to
viral incubation.
When we started to raise turkeys on our farm, we encountered all
the health problems that make turkey rearing so infamously challenging.
Instead of turning to drugs, synthetics, and commercial rations,
we researched holistic options. We fed the turkeys greens, gave
them probiotics, used natural disease-fighting agents like garlic
and cayenne in their feed, and overcame health problems that the
conventional poultry industry declared impossible. Our turkeys
are now the picture of health.
Our turkey losses are nearly zero, a huge contrast to conventional
operations where loss is much greater. The feathers of our birds
are brilliantly white, firm, and clean, in contrast to feathers
of the birds raised in commercial barns, which are soiled with
feces,
weak, and scruffy, lacking lustre. Our birds’ organs
are so vibrantly coloured and healthy that the provincial inspector
comments on them each time we take the turkeys to slaughter. He
tells us how good the birds look compared to what he is accustomed
to seeing on kill lines from conventional poultry operations.
Finally, our customers, some of them diagnosed as "allergic" to
meat, can not only eat our meat without a problem, but tell
their friends and neighbours about the dramatic difference in flavour,
texture, and quality compared to conventional fare. This is
not rocket science; it is just doing things right rather than what
is “economically efficient” or what “modern agricultural
science” dictates.
The Turkey Farmers of Ontario are defending a feeble position
with pseudo-science, in the interests of greed, trying to eliminate
viable competition that contrasts their gross deficiencies in bird
health and humane husbandry standards to something much better.
They are desperately trying to defend a substandard product by
ensuring there is nothing superior with which to compare it.
Should not our governments be honouring and supporting the efforts
of Matthew Dick and other progressive farmers who strive to find
a safer and more sustainable way to produce healthy food for our
population? The health of the population starts with the farmer's
soil and husbandry practices. How much longer will the government
be partner to unbridled corporate greed unleashed on our country's
agriculture, costing us health and future sustainability?
Mark Benson
Click HERE to read the notice to which Mark responded.