This is not 'A Course in Miracles,' but a course in confusion...
if one were to ask me, but I know you're not asking me.
ACIM states that it is non-religious, more sectarian, but spiritual. What is
that? It then goes on to say, "A Course in Miracles was 'scribed'
by Dr. Helen Schucman through a process of inner dictation she identified as
coming
from Jesus. A clinical and research psychologist and tenured Associate Professor
of Medical Psychology, she was assisted by Dr. William Thetford, her department
head, who was also a tenured Professor of Medical Psychology at the Medical
Center where they both worked."
If this so far has not confused you, read this ---
"What exactly, then, is A Course in Miracles? The summary
introduction, which appears in its Text, is quite succinct and brief. It reads:
'This is a course in miracles. It is a required course.
Only the time you take it is voluntary. Free will does not mean that you can
establish the
curriculum.
It means only that you can elect what you want to take at a given time.
The course does not aim at teaching the meaning of love, for that
is beyond what can be
taught. It does aim, however, at removing the blocks to
the awareness of love’s
presence, which is your natural inheritance. The opposite of love is
fear, but what is all-encompassing can have no opposite.'"
This is a mass
of confusion. It is small enough to be in your heart, large enough
to fill the universe, the opposite of fear, which is love
that no
one can teach.
There is opposition in all things, but not if all-encompassing. This
person is psychotic.
"This course can therefore be summed up very simply in this way:
Nothing real can be threatened.
Nothing unreal exists.
Herein lies the peace of God."
I am sorry I do not wish to take the time to even look further beyond the
confusion of the introduction of ACIM.
You have written far more that I would have even attempted to ponder
on their misguided, delusional concepts. We all know the source
of ACIM and
it is
not the Jesus of Nazareth that I know.