Definition of False Teacher: One
who presumes to teach in the Name of the Lord when God has not sent
- Wayne Bent
years ago we met a man claiming to be the Messiah. He went by the
name of “Michael Travesser,” the
assumed name of Wayne Bent, the same person that was in the news as the “leader
of an apocalyptic cult” arrested in New Mexico on unspecified charges.
There is talk of child molestation, which Bent denies, though he does
admit to having slept with three of his followers’ wives, including
his son’s, at the direction of God and the instigation of the women.
(“The man said, ‘The woman whom You gave to be with me, she
gave me of the tree, and I ate’” Genesis 3:12 HNV – only
these were not the women God gave to Wayne.)
While it is easy to dismiss such antics as those of a delusional sociopath,
people who have tried talking to Wayne and his followers have found themselves
unable to effectively argue against their delusion. In this string of
correspondence, we show Wayne how he is wrong according to the Scriptures
he used to justify his sins, while exposing his arrogant, wrongheaded
manner for all to see.
On October 22, 2001, Paul sent this letter to “Michael Travesser”:
Several weeks ago I met “Blessed Quietness” and “Obedient
Servant” in a chat room discussing recent world events. BQ
gave me your web address, and I in return gave her ours.
Since then I have red the website. There are many things said therein
that are true, such as the coming of the Lord in the flesh (here
and now) and the utter corruption of mankind’s religious works.
There is also gross error.
I will point out some of the error found in “The Finished
Work.” Despite what I have to say here, the tone and spirit
of my letter is not one of railing, but of kind and gentle remonstrance.
I would that you all would see the error of your ways and repent.
I ask you, Michael, to print this letter. Surely you should have
no fear of what I say. Only good can come of open communication,
not in strife but in peaceable pursuit of truth and His righteousness.
#1. I begin by presenting the opposition of Scripture to the sign
of your alleged coming as Messiah. If you read no further, this
will establish for the record that what is happening amongst you
people is deception. You can’t contradict the testimony of
Scripture both in appearance and essence and be the perfect will
of God expressed to man.
According to the testimony of what has happened amongst you, the
two women with whom you copulated are the two witnesses spoken of
in Scripture. You wrote of these women:
“In Revelation 11,
we can read of the two witnesses and what they do. The two witnesses
prophesy and give testimony for 3 1/2 years. They stand before
the God of the whole earth as the two cherubim did in the Most
Place. They are also two olive trees. A reference to the two olive
trees may be found also in Zech. 4.”
It is also said in Zechariah 4 that these two witnesses are referred
to as the “SONS of oil.” And in Revelation 11 they are
called PROPHETS, not prophetesses. We also see in Zechariah that
Joshua and Zerrubabel were types of these two witnesses, and they
are MEN. THE TWO WITNESSES ARE MEN.
Throughout the Scriptures, the Lord sends men out in the ministry,
not women. Men are sent to testify of the word of God in all stations
of ordained ministry (evangelists, pastors, teachers, apostles,
PROPHETS), but not women. In Christ there is neither male nor female,
this is of course true, but we speak of the Word of God and established
order of things in the days of our flesh. That has not changed.
In this alone there is reason to stop now and reconsider everything,
but I will give you more.
#2. Michael, it is stated that you are Messiah, and often you speak
with the capitalized form of pronoun. Yet you also ask that the
people pray for you. Here is another example of confusion that comes
of the deception you labor under. You make the following two statements:
“This was the work of the second coming
of Messiah. I was told that men must believe in me, pray for me
and support me with
their prayers and supplications regarding the experience of Him
that He was now leading me into....”
What, are we to pray for God while we believe in Him!? And your
“I AM their Deliverer and I AM the
One who will lift them up. These souls do not seek to get anything,
or to save themselves
from anything, for they know all things come from Me. They trust
only in Me and what I AM desiring for them.”
But we must pray for Him!? How can this be said of the One Who
says, “...every beast of the forest is Mine, and the cattle
upon a thousand hills. I know all the fowls of the mountains: and
the wild beasts of the field are Mine. If I were hungry I would
not tell you; for the world is Mine and the fullness thereof” (Psalm
Only a deceived heart, pursuing its own lusts, would mistake what
Michael says for God. Repent, Michael, and all you people. For goodness’ sake,
#3. There is additional confusion in the assertion that a person
must receive the consummation of your marriage (as described to
these two women) by faith, yet all kinds of carnal reasons are given
as to why it was done. As put in the paper:
“Why were there two witnesses? Firstly,
it is written: ‘In
the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ The
two witnesses and Michael the Messiah established every word. One
witness only would look too much like an earthly marriage. It could
not sufficiently break into the mental patterns of earth and establish
heavenly images. The people would merely think that Messiah was
as they were. More than two witnesses would seem too much like a
harem. It would seem as if there was no discriminating voice to
guide the events. That would say to the mind that Michael would
indiscriminately become intimate with whomever He desired instead
of following a divinely inspired plan. Heaven has its order even
when certain events are not in the earthly order. Two witnesses
would also reflect the multi-membered bride of Christ. Finally,
the Scriptures prophesy of the two witnesses who stand before the
God (Messiah) of the whole earth. They receive His anointing and
give that anointing to other lamps.”
Since when is God concerned about how He would be viewed by men?
If this were the case why was Jesus born of a virgin? Why would
He come appearing as an uneducated bastard pauper? Why would Noah
build an ark in a dry country? Why would Isaiah walk around naked
for 3 years?
Michael claims that you must simply believe God had two married
women commit adultery with him as a sign of the Lord’s coming.
Yet if you are to receive it by faith, why the need for all the
carnal reasonings? God does not do things this way. Can you see
Jesus trying to explain to everyone why He was born of a virgin?
But man justifies himself.
Yours is a work of man. The greater guilt
is upon you because you directly claim to be Christ. The Law of
God states that those who take upon themselves His Name in vain
will not be held guiltless. Despite what you consider yourselves
to be, the Law has not been suspended on your behalf. In fact
it remains on your behalf. Repent and be delivered from your destruction.
#4. The writings suggest that salvation is dependent on men’s
abilities to see and believe Michael. This is the way of false religious
works, which are based on man asserting his own righteousness, faith,
and willpower. The structure depends on man, and if he fails, it
fails. For example, Michael writes, “He
also stated that if I failed, the people would fail with me, and
if they would not believe
in me, their own hope for salvation would be ended.”
This is not how things work with God; He does not fail. He upholds
those whom He chooses. Things are not out of control with Messiah
perched precariously on his own works and others on their own. God
is not dependent on man. His own arm brought Him salvation. Jesus
did not manifest or teach this spirit of pressure to perform - grasping
and compelling others to feel desperately dependent on Him and themselves.
There is a very different manifestation of spirit here. Is it too
late for any there to hear?
#5. The central event that we are enjoined to receive by faith (planned
adultery) is likened to Abraham offering up Isaac, something that “seemed
quite unnatural and something which seemed against the commandments.”
There is a profound difference between the two situations. In Abraham’s
case it is said that he was being tried. God did not have him violate
any commandment because He stopped Abraham from killing Isaac. In
fact, Abraham fulfilled the first commandment in loving God with
all his heart and mind by obeying. But in your case, Michael, we
have a violation of the commandment to not commit adultery, which
thing God did not do with Abraham. Both sacrifice of children and
adultery are abhorrent to God.
An attempt is made to explain away the fact that adultery took
You write: “These events could not
rationally be construed into a man sneaking around trying to commit
adultery with another
wife, especially since the future consummation was all announced
beforehand in clear detail to the congregation. Nothing was secret
or hidden. The witnesses to the event were given over beforehand
by the ones who had previously laid claim to them.”
because a man determines to give his wife to another man does
not make it
acceptable or not adultery. Abraham tried to give his wife to
another man; it wasn’t OK then, and it isn’t now.
People do many things out in the open, without shame, which are
and evil. Such a measuring stick is not right; it places confidence
in man, not God.
You write: “If men would tell the truth
only for a minute, the crisis would not be upon the earth, but
they will not tell the
Friends, you have things backwards. You expect men to tell the
truth, yet “Let God be true, but every man a liar” (Romans
3:4). However, God rules over all from heaven, so, thankfully, it
is not unregenerate men who determine the ultimate outcome. It would
be an evil outcome, as you continually conclude and pronounce, rather
than a good one, as He has spoken and given those who believe to
know and have hope.
#6. The “witnesses” offering themselves and later the
husbands offering them, all apparently incommunicado, is offered
as proof of a miracle and God’s leading. Nothing could be
further from the truth. Firstly, the idea of this consummation was
put out there on more than one occasion as referred to in the writing:
“I began trying to prepare the people
in the land for the eventuality of a literal, physical consummation
as Jesus tried to
prepare His people for the literal cross that was before Him. At
the Jewish New Year camp meeting, I strongly emphasized the literal,
physical consummation of that marriage. I believe few actually got
the significance of what was presented. Even though I spoke plainly
It is clear that the carnal idea was planted in the minds of the
“I knew that some of the church people
saw things the same way, for some had reservations that I would
sleep with their wives
when presented with the image the Father had presented me. That
proved they had the earth view of it as I had.”
It is really not hard at all to imagine what things will transpire
with such seed and a little watering.
Even if events are of a miraculous nature that
does not mean they are of God. Remember that Wicked whom the Lord
shall consume with
the spirit of His mouth, “Even him, whose coming is after
the workings of Satan with all power and signs and lying
But there is considerable natural explanation for what happened
#7. Another contradiction is this: You excoriate men’s religious
works, yet you also cite them as providing the critical link in
Bible prophecy that points to your role as Messiah, using dates
relating to a religious dispute between a monk and the Catholic
“On the last day of the consummation,
21 days after the beginning, I was shown that the Messiah had
come and consummated the marriage
exactly 483 years to the day after the beginning of the Reformation,
which officially commenced with the nailing of the 95 Theses by
Martin Luther on the church door at Wittenburg, October 31, 1517.
Sixty nine weeks of years had passed, and to the day, the marriage
in heaven was satisfied. ‘Know therefore and understand, that
from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build
Jerusalem [The beginning of the Reformation] unto the Messiah the
Prince shall be seven weeks, and threescore and two weeks.’”
As we can see, your claim hinges on this critical piece of timing.
But God does not consider a monkish dispute to be the beginning
of the commandment to restore Jerusalem. The Catholic church never
was what Jerusalem represents, the people of God. Luther wasn’t
fixing true Christianity, he was disputing from within Mystery Babylon.
It was an inner family squabble, and still is.
#8. There is yet more confusion.
Michael, you write: “The crucifixion
of Jesus was the plan of hell, but they had thought the cross
would overthrow Him. It
did not, and hell was confounded. So it is with the marriage.”
Yet in another place you write: “Satan
tried every possible offense to get Messiah to save Himself and
yield up the contest,
repenting that He had followed His Father’s leading. Again,
the adversary failed, and now it is too late to overturn it. It
This is true and contradicts your former statement and the Scriptures,
which states that it was not the plan of hell that Jesus was delivered
over to the wicked, but it was done “by the determinate counsel
and foreknowledge of God” (Acts 2:23). It was the plan of
God, even foretold by the Passover feast, which Jesus fulfilled.
It is not necessarily sin to be confused or wrong, but you don’t
have the luxury of being wrong on the things of God, as God.
#9. You write: “And the two witnesses
will be far more effective in sharing their experience of the
Most Holy Place than Michael.
They not only receive Michael and His Father’s love, but they
receive their own added experience and can pour that oil onto others
as Michael poured it upon them.”
It is impossible that the Messiah, in resurrection power, is less
capable than two mortals that can die. How can anyone be more effective
in getting the message out than the Message Himself?! He is the
Spirit of prophecy that gives men a testimony. Yours is unsound
spiritual reasoning, for which a man can be forgiven, but for which
he certainly can’t be considered as God.
#10. There is a subtle and not so subtle context in the writing
that negates God’s order in relationships. Evidence of this
overturning of God’s order and law is in the following description
and explanation of events:
“The Father came down upon the two
witnesses and anointed them for this specific purpose. They gave
up earthly relationships,
children and personal property. This fulfilled the words of Jesus. ‘If
any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife,
and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also,
he cannot be my disciple.’ Luke 14:26. ‘So likewise,
whosoever he be of you that forsaketh not all that he hath, he cannot
be my disciple.’ Luke 14:33. The two witnesses forsook all
that they had. The two witnesses hated their earth for the love
of Messiah. They forsook all that they had to come to Him. So it
is that they will be the first fruits. ‘But every man in his
own order: Christ (Messiah) the first fruits; afterward they that
are Christ’s at his coming.’ 1 Cor. 15:23. The forsaking
of husbands, children, homes and any other interest is represented
by the two witnesses. They are signposts as to what the soul must
yield in order to be married to God.”
Nowhere does Scripture ever justify women forsaking husbands. Even
the very Scriptures you quoted to make your case testify against
you. Women are not called to do as the “witnesses” did,
forsaking their husbands, any more than men (as bride) are called
on to forsake Christ (husband).
#11. How did Michael come to believe he is Messiah? According to
your testimony you received a spirit in the land you purchased.
This spirit has manifested itself through you, working with your
man of sin to convince you that you are God (II Thess 2). Your fascination
with this land reveals that you were not going by revelation from
above. The following only shows that you equate a bargain with the
leading of God:
“I was somewhat dumbstruck that the
best property I had found was the least money. The mark of Father
was all over it.”
You perished with your money in that thought. You even go so far
as to say that God Himself resided in this piece of land! Here is
the outlandish statement:
“... I began feeling a great urge to
pursue the purchase of the new land that I had sound where I had
felt the wonderful
silence of the soul. I believed that God Himself resided in this
We know that God does not reside in beautiful scenery. He resides
in His people, and such as worship Him find Him not in this mountain
or that physical place, even where He had His Name previously, but
in Spirit and in Truth. This land spirit which entered you is altogether
another spirit than the Spirit of God.
You write: “Shortly after I posted
the Song, as I sat in my living room chair, I was strongly directed
by God, ‘You
are Messiah.’ At this moment, the Spirit I had previously
felt in the land entered into me. Now this Spirit of perfect rest
and peace was no longer out there and influencing me. It was fully
in my own soul and was identified with my own person. That Spirit
was now who I was. I became God- possessed. This was my deliverance
and the end of all my human woes.”
Michael, that spirit was not God, but one that had license to possess
you because of your lusts.
#12. It therefore follows that this experience of “nirvana,” coming
from a spirit in the land and not God, wasn’t the end of all
human woes. It is a demonic trap to think that, because you have
a wonderful experience and feeling of release or ecstasy, it’s
of God. In the Scriptures the saints who came into contact with
the living God described feelings of anything but release or ecstasy.
Even John, who walked in the Spirit for many years, fell at His
feet as dead when he saw Him. Devils give good feelings which mask
disease. God gives holy fear, Whose end is peace and rest to the
inward man. However, Paul describes the battles he had in his flesh.
The expectation of a floating bliss is a delusion of devils, unreal
and unholy. You make an appearance at the wedding feast without
the wedding garment.
#13. Using the words of a false prophetess for confirmation of
doctrine and the work of God is a sign of falsehood. Michael, you
liberally quote Ellen White. She often went insensate under the
influence of devils, which is something true prophets do not do
(“the spirits of the prophets are subject to the prophets”).
Devils are very religious talkers, and hers were no different. Having
been made familiar with some of her teachings I pick up on them
throughout your writings.
For example, you state: “In the Old
Testament there are examples of strong judgment which precludes
any hope of repentance. A man
or woman may have a physical encounter and still be alive to think
and to live, but when one is killed, no such opportunity exists.
Murder would seem a far greater crime than adultery and with far
greater consequences. In 1 Kings 18:40, Elijah killed about four
hundred men. That is a good number of dead bodies. They could never
now repent for what they had done.”
This statement shows you ascribe to the erroneous idea that those
who physically die without faith are asleep and slated for annihilation,
which Ellen White taught (or you believe something even worse, torment
without end). This is all unScriptural. The Lord preached to the
spirits in prison who were disobedient in the days of Noah. It is
not all over at physical death, as taught by those who wish these
things upon others, often in bitterness over their own rejection.
And for the Adventist answer that the above Scripture is talking
about spirit beings who are not men, look at the verse further on
(I Peter 4:6), “For this cause was the gospel preached also
to them that are dead, that they might be judged according to men in the flesh, but live according to God in the Spirit.”
#14. You apply a double standard in your writing. You expect the
carnal man to receive the things you speak, and when he doesn’t,
a condemnation follows that appears as righteous indignation and
You write: “I came in the clouds of
heaven, I gathered Your children from the four winds, separating
the sheep from the goats,
but few men have heard my call. Few men will see me with the eyes
of their heart, except to drive me away from them. I have explained
things clearly, and made all things plain, but they would have none
of it. They turned their eyes away greatly desiring that they not
be convinced of the truth, for they loved their sins.”
You explained things so clearly! And stupid men, they didn’t
listen, so now you give them over to their just desserts for not
accepting your explanations! How unlike the One you say you are!
He spoke in parables, and didn’t explain things to those who
didn’t believe. And instead of calling fire down from heaven,
as you do in your manner and spirit, He rebuked His disciples, James
and John, for thinking such thoughts and forgave those who crucified
Him. Yet you would consign those who simply disagreed with you to
unimaginable pain or annihilation! And on top of that you are wrong!
Is this not enough audacity for everyone listening? Have you not
had enough? Must you all go down in flames, destroyed with the judgments
you pronounce on others?
You write: “Hear me precious Lover
of the soul, and come down now in Your justice. You must now do
Your work of strangeness,
that mysterious letting go and giving over. How hard it is for You,
but it must be done. Oh, Friend, now thrust in the sickle and let
the wrath be revealed, for it must come. We will turn away from
those who have loved to destroy the earth, and Your children will
ascend from off its surface into the realms of Your peace.”
Your children happen to be whoever agrees with you, the rest be
damned. However, “if you love them which love you what reward
have you, do not even publicans the same?” (Matthew 5:46)
The child of God is called to higher. Michael, you are bitter, and
not so empty as you think.
You write: “There are those who have
dared to tell me that they were good people. I do not know a good
person. Tell Me now,
waste my time with your sorcery and say that you are good. How dare
you lie right to My face about your goodness. You are not good and
you are not good at all. You lie daily, and you lie in this. You
are vain, self-interested, self-preserving, and nauseating. You
are crude and course. I am saying this to the Pope, the minister,
the religious practitioner, the one who offers many prayers. I am
saying this to the President, the Congress, the attorneys and those
in the soup kitchens. I say this to the Red Cross, the Red Crescent,
the Christian, Muslim, Jew and spiritualist. You ALL stand unfit,
and untrue. You are liars and you follow your master the devil in
the carrying out of your schemes, albeit, some of you pretend you
are nice and even godly.”
Michael, you know not what spirit you are of. You have taken personally
real and imagined insults, and now you will wreak havoc on man who
has had the audacity not to believe you. The judgment you sense
coming is your own, and those who follow you likewise partake in
You write: “The sadness of my Father
has been felt by me. He has borne long with this generation. The
nations have had centuries
to consider and to build upon the things the first coming of Messiah
presented. There are millions who claim to believe in Messiah, but
they only believe in a picture the flesh has concocted. They cannot
receive me, since they cannot comprehend through the flesh those
things revealed by the Spirit.”
Again, you look to man and his righteousness and reject all men,
condemning them for what you surpass them all in, ignorance and
presumption. Since when was it dependent on man’s ability
to get it right?
They didn’t listen to you, billions over the centuries. Hence
this glorious messiah named Michael will destroy 99.9999999% of
mankind. Satan is victorious. Yet God truly reigns sovereign in
Heaven and it is declared:
“All nations that You have made shall come and worship before
You, O Lord, and shall glorify your Name” (Psalm 86:9).
“...Who will have all men to be saved and to come to a knowledge
of the truth... Who gave Himself a ransom for all, to be testified
in due time” (I Timothy:4, 6).
#15. On your website, Michael, you use depictions of the Lord Jesus
contrary to the second commandment of God. This is not right; it
is sin. “For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments,
and His commandments are not grievous” (I John 5:3).
#16. The method of testing you teach for the validity of your claims
is not new, but it is diabolical:
“One may now ask himself the question,
What if all of this is a deception? Father foresaw this concern
so thereby made a way.
It was stated early on that all the people should go to the Father
and ask Him if these things happening in the land were of Him. ALL
said that Father revealed to them that He had brought these things
to pass when they asked Him.”
This method has been well proven by the Mormon church in particular,
which presses men to ask God the same of Joseph Smith and his revelation
as you do here. Interestingly enough, those under their influence
get the same answer as your congregation get. I have met such, and
they testify, with tears in their eyes, of their blessed assurance
of the validity of their prophet. They are deceived by demons no
less than you people are. Did Jesus ever ask people to tempt God
with such questions of Himself? Only insecure and wicked men do
such a thing. Demons are only too willing to oblige those who worship
man, with all kinds of manifestations and feelings.
#17. As I mentioned at the beginning, it is true that Christ comes
in His people, in the flesh. However, Michael, you speak as if you
are the One and Only Messiah. That is not so; His body is corporate.
We come in His Spirit and Name and even now we speak to you from
Him. It is His testimony that we speak to you. In no way, as His
servants, could we ever point to you as Messiah, for we point to
the Risen Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. We are brethren of Paul
and Barnabas, who ripped their clothes when men thought to worship
them as gods. We receive the testimony of Jesus from our brothers
and sisters, and, as Moses, we would love to see all His people
prophesying. But you appropriate to yourself what belongs solely
to God. You, sir, blaspheme. Not only are you destroying yourself
but those who believe you. You are in all evil, Michael. We say
this not to condemn but to win you and those with you to the One
you claim to be. We are here on His behalf.
You speak falsely concerning what I have posted. Either you are
lying, or you have not read what I have written. Either you are
twisting what you have read to suit yourself, and prove your words
to yourself, or Satan blocks you sight when you read over what
I have said. I can assure you, you do not know what I have said
from what you write here.
I posted my letter only a few minutes before receiving your response
(literally 5 minutes); it is impossible that you have read thoroughly
what I have said. You may surmise from a glance, but I suggest you
read the whole letter carefully. You will see I have quoted you
extensively, making your assertion, that I haven’t red the
website, erroneous. Since I have red it, and the proof is there
(not only do I quote you, but I am intimately familiar with where
you are coming from and what you are claiming), it is again shown
that you are one seduced by lying spirits. Talk about having their
sight blocked, you do not even read what I write, and then you jump
to conclusions! If you wish to correspond on these things, I suggest
you do so point by point, if you can. I have taken the time to carefully
review your materials; generic platitudes and accusations in return
will not cut the mustard.
Victor had written “Michael” before Paul’s letter,
sharing some things about us and asking him some questions. “Michael” would
not give any substantive answers. Here is what Victor wrote back
When Jesus was about to ascend into Heaven to be on the right hand
of the Father, He said, “All power (authority) has been given
Me in Heaven and in earth....” With that authority comes knowledge,
and with His knowledge, authority. Jesus Christ never lost that
authority and knowledge since the resurrection, reigning until all
things are put under His feet. He was never to die again, having
conquered death itself.
You have read my website and have known that I declare in my testimony
that I am that man walking with the Lord Jesus Christ in the dream
God gave me in 1972. So I am. For one who says he is the Messiah,
you know very little, and your conduct and words betray you. Michael,
your end is not good, even as your path to your end is not good
if you continue on it. But so it must be, that the Scriptures recording
the Words of the One with Whom I walk in this day, and Whom you
claim to be, might be fulfilled: “For there shall arise false
Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders;
insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very
Let it be declared on your site that I, Victor Hafichuk, have spoken
these things to you and to all those who witness your claims and
conduct. On the land, as recorded, you received a seducing spirit.
You will fall if you continue as you do, exposed as a false messiah,
and so will those with you. This is not a vindictive statement or
one of enmity toward you or one of any ill will toward you and yours.
I would rather that you repent and be delivered from destruction.
It would be a joy to me.
I delight in
your letter this day. It only proved My Father’s
word to Me. My Father told Me who you were and that is why I did
not answer your questions any longer. You may declare what you will,
but you are a bag of wind and deception. You are the counterfeit
of My appearing, the adversary of My Father’s words to Me.
No, I have not
read your website. I didn’t even know you
had one. Your false prophecy reveals your misguided nature. When
we communicated, I could see your nature missed my communications
altogether. You would continue to take My words in a different way
than I intended. I knew by this you were not of My Father. Your
spirit did not connect with my Spirit.
If you stood
next to Christ you would be standing next to Me, for I AM He that
is to come into the world. I know this, for even this
morning My Father’s precious love came down on Me with great
power. He put His mouth on My mouth so that I would only speak His
words. His head is on My head, and His hands on My hands.
Yes, it is fulfilled that there will be weeping and gnashing of
teeth. You may gnash your teeth against Me all you like, but My
heart is not driven by the ranting of common men. My heart is driven
by My Father who gave Himself over into My soul. If you knew Him,
you would know Me.
“Michael” also lashed out at us on his website. “Obed” and “Blessed
Quietness” jumped in, sending us letters defending their “Messiah.” Here
are two further replies from Victor that wrap things up:
I read your latest diary, speaking against me. You say I rant and
rave but you no longer know or care to know the difference between
truth spoken for your sake and ranting and raving. Truly, your website
is full of what you accuse me of.
It is obvious that you are trying to convince somebody, but whom?
Your followers? Do they need convincing if they have “your
spirit”? Are you trying to convince the wicked whom you say
do not believe you? I thought you said you were finished with those,
not interested in saving them. I can quote you on that. Or perhaps
you are trying to convince yourself! Most likely. Need the Messiah
convince anyone? Need the Messiah rant and rave about His creation
for whom He gave His life?
Michael, when a fool is a fool, he is a fool! How dark you are,
and how spiritually arrogant and ill! Post this letter on your site,
coward. Don’t delete it and ignore it while ranting and raving
in your diary. Post my letter with my name; put me down on public
record as to my words toward you this day. I dare you to expose
me to others or risk exposing yourself. For those who have eyes
to see, you have already exposed yourself. You are the one in fear.
I am not. Go ahead, post this, and I ask each and every reader to
copy it and keep it on record. We will see who speaks falsehood
and who speaks truth. You are a self and Satan deluded imposter,
and you will fall, and fall hard. Print that, you coward and fox.
In the Name of the One and True Lord Jesus Christ, Whom I serve
of heart and zeal,
You have dealt with a lot of phonies in your religious life. You
are one yourself. This time you have stumbled on the Stone and you
will proceed no further. Now you are dealing with the Lord Himself
through us, Whom we represent, not presumptuously, religiously,
and falsely as do you, but in the Spirit of the Lord and in Truth.
Your game is up.
You are a spiritual idiot, mad, consumed with yourself. I defy
you to your face. You say your “witnesses” speak forth
fire out of their mouths, according to Revelation 11:5. I say they
spew dung out of your mouth. We will see who speaks fire. You don’t
intimidate me; you are one who is the son of the prince of fear.
You are spiritually senseless, ignorant, lawless, a son of pride
and arrogance of the first degree. You have nothing whatsoever to
do with the Lord Jesus Christ but with Ashtoreth, the pagan sex
goddess of lust and fertility, both you and your lecherous “witnesses.”
Go ahead, “Obed” and “Blessed Quietness,” remain
in bed, as you declare and choose, with your whoremonger, according
to the principle expressed in Revelation 2:20-21: “Nevertheless,
I have a few things against you, because you allow that woman Jezebel,
who calls herself a prophetess, to teach and seduce My servants
to commit sexual immorality and eat things sacrificed to idols.
And I gave her time to repent of her sexual immorality, and she
did not repent.”
You are even now cast into a sickbed: “Indeed I will cast
her into a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her into
great tribulation, unless they repent of their deeds. I will kill
her children with death, and all the churches shall know that I
am He Who searches the minds and hearts. And I will give to each
one of you according to your works” (Rev. 2:22-23).
I again defy you to publish all that I write to you for the public
record. I have nothing to fear, you have everything to fear; I have
all things, you have nothing.
In the Glorious Name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Praise God in the
Highest! Let His enemies be thoroughly ashamed! Amen!