Bob started this thread by commenting on an article on our site, Who
Then Can Be Saved?! He claims we do not understand the meaning
of “all,” yet
here is a note I wrote to Richard Boyce (whose blog promptly disappeared
after I sent this letter to it), about who does not understand:
Richard, why insist on making it so difficult? “All” means
all, or God would have said “some.” For example, compare:
From: “For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ all will be made
alive” (1 Corinthians 15:22 EMTV).
To: “For as in Adam some die, even so in Christ some will be made
alive” (1 Corinthians 15:22 EMTV).
From: “For it pleased the Father that in Him all fullness should
dwell. And through Him having made peace through the blood of His cross,
it pleased the Father to reconcile all things to Himself through Him,
whether the things on earth or the things in Heaven” (Colossians
1:19-20 MKJV).
To: “For it pleased the Father that in Him some fullness should
dwell. And through Him having made peace through the blood of His cross,
it pleased the Father to reconcile some things to Himself through Him,
whether the things on earth or the things in Heaven” (Colossians
1:19-20 MKJV).
And from: “That in the dispensation of the fulness of times He
might gather together in one all things in Christ, both which are in
Heaven, and which are on earth; even in Him” (Ephesians 1:10 KJV).
To: “That in the dispensation of the fulness of times he might
gather together in one some things in Christ, both which are in Heaven,
and which are on earth; even in Him. The rest will burn in hell
forever” (Ephesians
1:10 KJV).
To answer the question, “Who then can be saved?” you say, “I
guess, then, the correct answer is ‘ALL that God wants to save’,
that’s who.”
Very good. Now who does God want to save?
“The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some men count
slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should
perish, but that all should come to repentance” ( Peter 3:9 KJV).
Did not Jesus say that with men these things are impossible but with
God all things are possible? Who is it that does not know the meaning
of the word “all”?
He is sovereign, and we make a good case for sovereign election - how
about you? You make a poor and unScriptural case for human election,
do you not? Why not determine the validity of men’s words and doctrines
by the Holy Scriptures rather than determining the Holy Scriptures and
their meaning by men’s doctrines?
You are changing and adding to God’s words. You are twisting God’s
straightforward and unequivocal words in order to align yourself with
men’s diabolical doctrines and interpretations of Scriptures. Before
you react with knee-jerk indoctrinated arguments, you need to carefully
read the writings on our site, because the answers to all your objections
are already there. Read The Good
News and The
Reconciliation of All Things in particular, but all that is posted in our section on The
Restitution of All Things.
Also, do not jump to erroneous conclusions about what we are preaching,
confusing it with the false gospel of the Universalists who do not call
for repentance or walking in the ways of God, not even knowing them or
doing so themselves. You can inform yourself of the difference between
what is Biblical, according to God, and what is not at this other section:
Universalism.
For the rest of you, along with Richard, I recommend The
SIGN: The Book of Jonah, the Book of God, which answers your debate on free will, election,
and God’s sovereignty over all things unto His salvation.
Lance brought up our article about the murderer, John
Calvin. Yes, that
is also a good one to read, for other reasons, demonstrating that “the
Kingdom of God is not eating and drinking [philosophizing about doctrines],
but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit” (Romans
14:17 MKJV). Indeed, we do know them by their fruits.
Paul Cohen
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce (Budding Theologian):
Don’t flatter yourself, Paul. I’m job hunting and don’t
need a blog showing my argumentative side.
Quote from Paul: Richard, why insist
on making it so difficult? “All” means
all, or God would have said “some.”
Quote from me: So evidently in these parts, “all” means
every human that’s
ever lived or ever will live.
Came across this gem tonight:
Galatians 2:14 says “But when I saw that
they walked not uprightly according to the truth of the gospel, I said
unto Peter before them all,
If thou, being a Jew, livest after the manner of Gentiles, and not as
do the Jews, why compellest thou the Gentiles to live as do the Jews?”
Good grief.
That means that Paul was like, 10 miles tall. Had to have been, if everyone
living (all, of course) could see him.
I didn’t know he was that big, to be honest.
Another quote from me:
John 4:29
“Come, see a man, which told me all
things that ever I did: is not this the Christ?”
That musta been one loooooooong conversation.
Another quote from me:
John 8:2
“And early in the morning he came again
into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down,
and taught them.”
Now that’s a big temple!
Another quote from me:
JOhn 18:40
“Then cried they all again, saying, Not
this man, but Barabbas. Now Barabbas was a robber.”
Imagine, the entire human race crying out at the same time. I bet that
was loud!
Another quote from me:
Acts 2:1
“And when the day of Pentecost was fully
come, they were all with one accord in one place.”
Good grief! That place musta been huge!
Another quote from me:
You know, I’m starting to think that “all” must
just have to be defined based upon context.
Have a nice day, sir.
---
Psalm 23:6
Hebrew Masoretic Text: "to/for a length of days"
King James Version of the Masoretic Text: "forever"
--Which words are God's, and which word is man's?
Young's Literal Translation: "...for a length of
days"
King James Version: "...for ever"
--Which translation is more accurate to the Hebrew text?
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
Paul- leave us.
I have my hands full exposing Calvin for being a heretic. One more is
too much.
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Amen...
On a serious note....can anyone tell me the difference between
theological error and heresy?
________________________________________
From JamesJerry:
Sure- when I am wrong it is error. When you are wrong it is heresy!
HAR HAR HAR
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Hahahaha.
________________________________________
From Paul
Cohen:
Of course, Richard, we would expect you to pontificate and then abdicate
just to get a lousy job in a world that is perishing, as are you, nurturing
and feeding your flesh. What a profession of faith you have! Yes, I am
sure Paul hid all his thoughts and letters when making tents for his
clients. Fool! What shame you bring to the Name of Christ by your ways!
Regarding the word “all,” you are right about context, but
entirely foolish in your arguments, proving me right and yourself wrong.
The quotes with which I provided you were perfectly in context of God’s
work of salvation through Christ, whereas you have given me more of your
perverse contortions.
I gave you:
“As in Adam ALL die, so in Christ shall
ALL be made alive.” How
many sons of Adam have inherited death? Every one of those will be made
alive in Christ.
You gave me:
“And when the day of Pentecost was fully
come, they were ALL with one accord in one place.” Who were “they” and how many
of them were there? The context tells us:
“until the day He was taken up, having given directions to
the apostles whom He chose, through the Holy Spirit; to whom He also presented
Himself living after His suffering by many infallible proofs, being seen
by them through forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to
the Kingdom of God. And having met with them, He commanded them
not to depart from Jerusalem...Then they...” (Acts 1:2-12 MKJV).
Other wretched examples of your intentional stupidity:
In the context of Paul speaking before “all” when he rebuked
Peter, obviously he was speaking of those present in that place.
The woman at the well was not speaking the word of God, as was Paul
the apostle in his teachings. She was speaking in superlatives, deserved
yes (does not Christ know all things?), but her words are not to be taken
as literally describing what happened there. Only an indoctrinated, opinionated,
argumentative fool would present them as proof that the Lord does not
mean all when He says all.
All the rest of your examples are similarly speaking of “all” in
a context that is self-evidently not speaking of every person that draws
breath, but those who were present in a particular place at a particular
time. Not so with the Scriptures I quoted. Will you now argue and persist
in proving yourself a fool? I would hope otherwise, but pride has you
firmly in its grasp.
Jerry, apparently your busyness has also made you oblivious. You are
so busy trying to prove that Calvin was a heretic you cannot see the
mother lode of proof before your eyes, with which I provided you in my
last post. But whereas I prove Calvin false by his fruits and his words,
you act as Calvin did by condemning me without proof. Calvin thought
it was all about him and you think it is all about you. So you are trying
to prove your brother is a heretic. Thankfully, as the Lord Jesus Christ
promised, a divided kingdom falls.
Back to you, Richard. The difference between theological error and heresy?
Theological error is wrong, period (yes, it is wrongness itself), whereas
heresy is in the eye of the beholder (Jerry alludes to this). For example,
the reconciliation of all things through Jesus Christ is heresy to you,
just as teaching against infant baptism was heresy to Luther and other
holders of the “orthodox” position. The problem with you
and your compatriots like Jerry is that you have theological theories
and orthodox positions, but are devoid of revelation or personal knowledge
of the Lord Jesus Christ. That is why you are found walking in the footsteps
of your fathers, the Pharisees, only multiplied in your scorning and
derision. It is about Christ, not Christianity, about faith, not doctrine,
and about love, not knowledge. You are a tare.
Never having known the Lord, you could not qualify as heretics of the
true faith (those who divide from the assembly of saints – 1 Corinthians
11:19). You have only been adherents of the black faith as part of the
body of Mystery, Babylon the Great. You are not as sows returning to
the mire, because you have never left the mire to receive cleansing from
the Lord in the first place.
A word to both of you:
“The heart of the wise is in the house of mourning; but the heart
of fools is in the house of laughter” (Ecclesiastes 7:4 MKJV).
Paul Cohen
________________________________________
From jwomble:
Paul looking at your website you look to be in great heresy-
I hope I am reading something wrong- but it appears that you deny the
trinity as well as denying eternal punishment for those outside of Christ.
You seem to be in great error- I hope God shows you the error that you
are in.
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
Paul is fer sure a heretic.
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Man, talk about anger issues!
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Tidbits from Paul’s website.
“One of the biggest and worst lies ever told in man-made Christianity,
one that John Piper subscribes to and teaches, is that there is a place
of interminable torment and punishment for sinners. Men think to find
this doctrine in the Bible, but while it is something the carnal man
would wish on others, it is surely not something God has ever said or
that ever entered into His mind.” From here.
“The Holy Ghost and Jesus Christ are one and the same person.
There is One God, manifest in three offices or roles, but not three persons.” From
here.
“Why are we condemned as a cult?...Could it be that I have
claimed to hear from God on many and diverse issues, condemning so
much of what
is believed and practised by nominal Christians? Obviously.” From
here.
“God manifest Himself in the weakness and limitation of flesh
to His creation, in the Person of Jesus Christ, to redeem all of mankind
from self, from sin, from darkness, from the world under the power of
the Serpent.
The Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, has been perfectly successful,
the fruits to be manifest in the fulness of time. All men will be delivered
from their sin, redeemed to confess Him as Lord on reverent and thankful,
not grudging and fearful, bended knee.” From here.
“IF FOR THESE THINGS WE ARE DEFINED OR IDENTIFIED AS A CULT,
SO BE IT, WE ARE A CULT, AND I MAKE NO APOLOGIES.” From here.
Sir, I truely hope that God grants you faith and repentance and saves
your soul. Until that happens, though, I have no part with you.
________________________________________
From Bob House:
Mr. Cohen,
I don’t have the time right now to respond to most of your post,
and I’m sure that my comments would go largely unheeded anyway.
However, I must point out a key problem with your interpretation. You
quoted Romans 5 in your attempt to justify your heretical notion of universalism:
Quote by Paul: “As in Adam ALL die, so in Christ shall ALL be
made alive.” How many sons of Adam have inherited death? Every
one of those will be made alive in Christ.
The problem here is that you are emphasizing the wrong part of the verse.
If you read the entire context of the passage, it is plain that Paul
is not teaching the eventual salvation of every individual who has ever
lived. Rather, if you put the emphasis in the right place, the contextual
meaning of all will be clear:
As in Adam all die, so in Christ shall
all be made alive.
What God is telling us is that all who are of the seed of Adam die.
Because of Adam’s sin, and Adam’s position as the federal
head of the human race, all must die. However, Christ provided the perfect
sacrifice for those given Him by the Father in eternity, therefore, those
are placed in Christ. As a child of God, I am now under the headship
of Christ; no longer in condemnation (Romans 8), but made alive!
This is extremely dangerous doctrine you are teaching, and is certainly
heretical (by the way, I don’t call everyone who doesn’t
believe just like me a heretic). There are too many passages which clearly
teach eternal punishment in the lake of fire for those who remain in
their sins to ignore.
________________________________________
From Victor Hafichuk:
Replies to Womble and JamesJerry
Womble, you have not looked very well, being frivolous and blind. If
you were to judge matters by the Scriptures and by spiritual revelation
from God instead of by man’s “orthodox doctrine” of “orthodox
Christianity,” which are heresy to God, you would find that we
preach from God’s throne, based solidly in Scripture. Why not read
the provided links for the proof to see that we back up what we teach
with God’s Word, while you believe diabolical falsehood. The
doctrines of trinity and eternal punishment as you know them are two
pagan, Christ-slandering
doctrines, and you need to repent of them.
As for you, JamesJerry, you show a proud, sober face but your remarks
are juvenile, ignorant, without substance, not nearly as cute as you
think, and highly irresponsible before man and God. What else should
be expected of the world?
We would not rebuke you if it were not for the fact that you profess
faith in Christ (or so one might suppose, seeing you appear here) but
you are among those Jesus sharply rebuked and we are with Him. Read our
presentations, search the Scriptures, ask God to give you humility and
brokenness, and perhaps you will be more inclined to have two full ears
rather than one empty mouth.
Victor Hafichuk
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
Vic- why don’t you and Paul craw back to your rock. You both are
heretics, most likely lost as Job’s goat, and fer sure doing the
work of Satan. This place is not for you. I understand that for someone
to believe as you do you have seared your mind to the truth, so a rebuttal
is unnessesary. Just leave and spread your heresy at your own website.
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Quote by Paul: As for you, JamesJerry, you show a proud, sober face
but your remarks are juvenile, ignorant, without substance, not nearly
as cute as you think...
I dunno. I finally found some common ground with him, hahahahaha.
________________________________________
From TR3:
Quote by Paul: Bob started this thread by commenting
on an article on our site, Who Then
Can Be Saved?! ...
I suggest that you take to heart the advice from John Robbins that you
have posted on your site:
Keep your damned (I speak literally) opinions
to yourself.
---
"My religious belief teaches me to feel as safe
in battle as in bed. God has fixed the time for my death. I do not
concern myself about
that, but to be always ready, no matter when it may overtake me. That
is the way all men should live, and then all would be equally brave."- " Stonewall" Jackson
________________________________________
From Paul Cohen:
Bob House’s Contention and Condition
Bob, not only has your answer not gone unheeded, but it was anticipated
and answered in advance. I told you in my first post to read the links
I gave there before making arguments that are already answered. You should
pay attention and hear a matter out before jumping to conclusions and
making false accusations that are provably unwarranted.
“If one answers a matter before he hears, it is folly and shame
to him” (Proverbs 18:13 MKJV).
You better hope all are to be saved because, if not, you will not be
among the saved; you aren’t now. As for your specific criticism,
I understand what you are saying. However, I was not putting the emphasis
in the sentence on the word “all” to the exclusion of “in
Christ.” I was only pointing out that the word “all” is
used, not “some.” If the verse meant what you wrongly interpret
it to mean, it would read:
“As in Adam all Christians have died, so in Christ shall all Christians
be made alive.”
But here is what the Scripture does say, in context, proving that the
promise of life in Christ applies to “all”:
“But each in his own order: Christ the first-fruit, and afterward
they who are Christ’s at His coming; then is the end, when He delivers
the Kingdom to God, even the Father; when He makes to cease all rule
and all authority and power. For it is right for Him to reign until He
has put all the enemies under His feet” (1 Corinthians 15:23-25
MKJV).
Just as those of us who believe and are part of His Body were once at
enmity with God and have now ceased from being His enemies...
“And you, who were once alienated and enemies in your mind by
wicked works, yet now He has reconciled in the body of His flesh through
death, to present you holy and without blemish, and without charge in
His sight” (Colossians 1:21-22 MKJV).
...so too shall all enemies cease in the same manner, being reconciled
to God:
“And through Him [Christ] having made peace through the blood
of His cross, it pleased the Father to reconcile all things to Himself
through Him, whether the things on earth or the things in Heaven” (Colossians
1:20 MKJV).
Your argument that the emphasis must be put on “in Christ” must
also be balanced with the emphasis on “in Adam” to be consistent.
If all were included “in Adam” then all are included “in
Christ.” And because you think you are “in Christ,” because
of some formulaic Baptist-style profession, does not make you “in
Christ.” Your vain gospel has snared you, deceiving you into a
false sense of security. You have never known the salvation of Jesus
Christ, and we are here to tell you so.
What do you think is happening with you here, Bob? Do you think you
will maintain your independence and enmity with God and the Son of Man
forever? No. You are now hearing the Word of God that will break you
in pieces and subdue you. The gospel of Christ and His salvation to come
is far from a ticket to lawlessness. It is a call to lawfulness for you,
which you cannot escape, your sinfulness exposed so you might come to
know the grace of God:
“But the Law entered so that the offense might abound. But where
sin abounded, grace did much more abound” (Romans 5:20 MKJV).
Grace wins out, not sin.
“And just as all people were made sinners as the result of the
disobedience of one man, in the same way they will all be put right with
God as the result of the obedience of the One Man” (Romans 5:19
GNB).
Who can argue that by Adam’s disobedience all were made sinners?
The point that Paul makes is that the power of Christ’s obedience
is greater than the power of Adam’s disobedience. No man being
able to do anything about his state, it is strictly by the grace of God
and His power that any are delivered from sin. What Adam brought on all
men is to be superseded in the fullness of time by what Christ has brought
on all men, God coming in the flesh to accomplish it.
Bob, you are not a child of God. If you were, you would recognize His
brethren, because they would also be your brothers. You do not recognize
us because you are a tare, a son of this world and the devil. But we
have no fear (lack of love) regarding your status, because not only has
Christ inherited all things, so have we. You are ours, to rule with a
rod of iron, for good and not evil:
“He who overcomes will inherit all things, and I will be his God,
and he will be My son” (Revelation 21:7 MKJV).
“And he who overcomes and keeps My works to the end, to him I
will give power over the nations. And he will rule them with a rod of
iron, as the vessels of a potter they will be broken to pieces, even
as I received from My Father” (Revelation 2:26-27 MKJV).
Yes, you will go into the Lake of Fire, just as Jesus said that every
man shall be salted with fire (Mark 9:49). Our God is a consuming fire.
You will come to know Him. Your knee shall also bow as you confess His
Name and give God glory, and not as you now do, in vain, incurring His
wrath.
Paul Cohen
________________________________________
From Paul Cohen:
JamesJerry and TR3: Bitter and Devoid of Substance
JamesJerry, No crawling necessary; we are already on the Rock. In fact,
that Rock is now on you:
“Whosoever shall fall upon that Stone shall be broken; but on
whomsoever It shall fall, It will grind him to powder” (Luke 20:18
KJV).
You admit you don’t know what you are talking about, using words
like “most likely” and “I understand.” You “think” but
don’t know. Yet you condemn us and abscond from any personal responsibility
of providing evidence. Therefore, the Lord Jesus Christ holds you responsible
for judging unrighteously, and He will not let you go as guiltless.
As for answering those here who have brought up the matter of the gospel
of Jesus Christ, Whom we preach, and who continue to argue without substance,
who are you to tell us not to answer? Is this your personal website?
Nevertheless, you obviously have nothing to say, we have told you so,
and there is nothing more to be said to you.
TR3, because we provide indisputable substance to back what we are saying,
and you do not, it is you who speaks damned opinion according to God.
In your present stance as an enemy of Christ you are not safe no matter
where you are, in bed or in battle.
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
I don’t think I’ve ever read pure hatred until reading the
last coupla posts.
Kinda freaky.
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Quote by Paul:
JamesJerry, No crawling necessary; we are already on the Rock. In fact,
that Rock is now on you:
“Whosoever shall fall upon that Stone shall be broken; but on
whomsoever It shall fall, It will grind him to powder” (Luke 20:18
KJV).
You admit you don’t know what you are talking about, using words
like “most likely” and “I understand.” You “think” but
don’t know. Yet you condemn us and abscond from any personal responsibility
of providing evidence. Therefore, the Lord Jesus Christ holds you responsible
for judging unrighteously, and He will not let you go as guiltless.
As for answering those here who have brought up the matter of the gospel
of Jesus Christ, Whom we preach, and who continue to argue without substance,
who are you to tell us not to answer? Is this your personal website?
Nevertheless, you obviously have nothing to say, we have told you so,
and there is nothing more to be said to you.
TR3, because we provide indisputable substance to back what we are saying,
and you do not, it is you who speaks damned opinion according to God.
In your present stance as an enemy of Christ you are not safe no matter
where you are, in bed or in battle.
Amazing what Google will teach a person. Check out this article. I apologize
in advance for the cursing from Paul.
TR3, because we provide indisputable substance to back what we are saying,
and you do not, it is you who speaks damned opinion according to God.
In your present stance as an enemy of Christ you are not safe no matter
where you are, in bed or in battle.
I’ll take my chances.
My trust is in the Lord, and whoever trusts in Him will not be diappointed.
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
Paul, as much as most of us here disagree about stuff, I think we can
all say you need to shove off.
DO I HAVE A WITNESS?
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
I’ll second that one.
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
Gather together brethern and “AMEN” our brother BT [Budding
Theologian... Richard Boyce)] for the homework on the two we should reject.
Or course- that was the least he could do. He brought them here. HAR
HAR
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
Reckon it’s “all” my fault, huh?
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
No- it would be the fault on us dumb enough to feed the egos of those
two. If we all ignore them, maybe they will go away.
Kind of like
the monsters under the bed.
________________________________________
From Bob House:
Ladies and Gentlemen of the FFF,
I must sincerely apologize for linking to the article at the beginning
of this post. I simply wanted to start an interesting discussion. If
I had known that it would have brought this influence to the board in
this manner, I would not have done so.
May God grant His grace and peace to them that are His.
________________________________________
From JamesJerry2:
Apology accepted. Now we can get back to fighting each other.
For those in the ministry and those training to be, how much more time
could we devote to our respective works if we left this site to rot.
Sigh, I am weening myself. It is fun and challenging, but fer sure not
much edifying.
Just rambling in the night here. Wife and kids out of town. I am sure
some of you understand. OK. I will shut up now.
________________________________________
From Richard Boyce:
I think all this site does is solidify us all into our respective positions.
________________________________________
From Paul Cohen and Victor Hafichuk:
The Lord told His servants and brethren, such as we are, what to expect:
“And you shall be hated by all for My Name’s sake” (Luke
21:17 MKJV).
Which is much different from what happens with the tares like Calvin
and Spurgeon:
“Woe to you when all men shall speak well of you! For so their
fathers did to the false prophets” (Luke 6:26 MKJV)
You have scrounged the cesspools of the net, drudging up every word
every liar has spoken against us without any examination or care for
proof and veracity. You consume it all equally because of your enmity
with God. You do not examine because you are incapable of righteous judgment.
You people are totally irresponsible against the truth, against the Lord
Jesus Christ. You can do nothing but judge unrighteously, bickering amongst
yourselves, and uniting only in your condemnation of God coming in the
flesh, His Anointed Body.
You have been judged, and all will know it.
For others who may come here and who have any shred of desire for truth
and equity, which even this corrupt world requires by law in its courts,
here are links to the actual full correspondences we had with the detractors
gathered by Richard Boyce on this blog. Unlike those who unjustly condemn
us, leaving out much if not all of what we have said to them, we provide
all the words of both sides.